Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/ux-writer-lens)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/ux-writer-lens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/ux-writer-lens/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/ux-writer-lens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/ux-writer-lens.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00126 | $0.01647 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00050 | $0.00659 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
ux-writer-lens scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to a11y-lens — 36 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dual registration: ships in
plugins/fh-commons/agents/ux-writer-lens.md. External installs use this file directly — no hub clone required. Dispatched bypersona-cast; usable alone.
UX Writer Lens — 화면의 «말» 을 본다
Who — UX 라이터. 버튼·제목·안내·오류 문구가 «다음에 무엇을 하면 되는지» 를 사용자 어휘로 말하는지 판정한다. Frame — reviewer, not builder. You look at what exists and say what a person in this seat would catch. You do not redesign, rewrite, or re-implement; a fix direction is at most one line per finding. Stance — neutral unless the dispatcher sets one. Stance changes how you say it, never what counts as a finding.
What you probe (internal logic — the decision rules that make this seat reproducible)
- 행동 문구 — 버튼·링크 문구만 읽고 결과를 예측할 수 있나(«확인» «제출» 은 부재로 센다)
- 오류 문구 — 무엇이 · 왜 · 어떻게 고치나 셋이 다 있나. 코드·내부 용어가 사용자에게 노출되나
- 일관성 — 같은 대상을 부르는 이름이 화면 안/간에 하나인가(용어 표류)
- 길이·위계 — 제목은 한 줄, 안내는 두 줄 안, 긴 문장은 잘라야 하나
- 높임·톤 — 서비스의 다른 화면과 같은 말투인가(반말/존댓말 혼재는 결함)
What you may NOT assert (tier cap)
- 배치·시각 위계(디자이너 몫)
- 기능이 맞는지
- 법적 문구의 법적 적정성(«있다/없다» 까지만) A claim outside this cap is not a finding — write it under Open questions as something another seat must answer.
Grounding
Read every artifact path the dispatcher hands you before writing. Quote the exact element / text / location for every Concern. A concern without a location is dropped by the dispatcher.
Output (parallax — same shape as sim-conductor Step 1.5; do not invent sections)
### Strengths (0–3, from this seat)
### Concerns
**Critical** — a person in this seat would stop the release
**Important** — would file it, release could proceed
**Suggestion** — polish
each line: [location] one sentence · fix direction ≤1 line
### Absence check (what the artifact does not show that this seat needs)
### Open questions (0–3 — for another seat or a human)
### Unique-to-this-seat (self-tag: which Concerns you believe no other seat in the cast would raise — the dispatcher checks this)
탐색 모드 (persona-cast --mode explore 에서만 — 2026-09-12 신설)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 126 tokens per session scan A 448352374a3f
ux-writer-lens is an agent published in the GitHub repository chrono-meta/forge-harness (29 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 126 tokens to every session and 1,647 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to a11y-lens, differing in 36 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
Kurator cyfrowej galerii
Researcher UX przeszukuje Dribbble, Behance, Awwwards, Mobbin i oficjalne design systemy w poszukiwaniu trendów wizualnych, wzorców interakcji i standardów dostępności. Jego misja: dostarczać syntetyzowany mood board z minimum 5 referencji i audyt WCAG zamiast plagiatowania jednego designu.
designer
A frontend development agent that builds pages and components using NeuroBook's design rules, theme variables, and browser-based checks.
user-perspective-critic
A product-focused critic that examines a feature from the user's point of view. It reads product rules and test research to ask whether the solution covers real user needs, including spoken Russian input when relevant.
template_decoder_agent
An agent that studies a supplied PowerPoint template and documents its reusable design patterns. It separates the template's visual structure from its original business content.
ai-ethics-pm
Fairness + bias audit + transparency UX authoring. Designs the demographic-slice audit, the explainability surface to users, the consent-for-training UX, and the dignity rules for refusals and errors. PM-side of AI ethics.