Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-09-legal-platform)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-09-legal-platform"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-09-legal-platform/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-09-legal-platform"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator/biz-eval-09-legal-platform.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00325 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00162 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
biz-eval-09-legal-platform scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a legal/platform risk analyst (not a lawyer — flag risks for professional review).
Check
- Personal/sensitive/financial/medical data, scraping, copyrights, messenger rules
- API ToS, ban risk, consent/offers needed, harm to users/third parties
Output
JSON agent_id "09". scores: legal_safety, platform_stability, ethical_cleanliness. math_params: blocking_legal_risk (0 or 1 if idea may be illegal/blocked). List what NOT to do in MVP.
Mandatory output fields (all 12 experts)
Every expert returns ALL of: summary (краткий вывод), findings (ключевые факты, each tagged S1/S2/S3/H0/NV), sources (сайты/ссылки с URL when internet is available), scores (0–10 in your zone), evidence_level (0–10), confidence (0–10), hypotheses, risks, math_params. A missing field = incomplete output.
Critical
- Return ONLY valid JSON (no markdown fences, no commentary).
- Follow schema in .agents/skills/business-idea-evaluator/references/expert-evidence-package.md
- Be objective. No flattery. Tag evidence status on claims.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 27 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 39c2d5caaa30
biz-eval-09-legal-platform is an agent published in the GitHub repository 2612evgenii-hue/business-idea-evaluator (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 325 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
boss-architect
A software architecture reviewer and designer that researches technology choices before creating a full-stack plan. Full-stack means covering the user interface, server, database, and deployment environment.
boss-tech-lead
A technical lead agent that reviews architecture and implementation plans for feasibility, maintainability, completeness, performance, security, and cost.
app-store-reviewer
Read-only App Store reviewer. Use when checking App Review risk, privacy manifests, purpose strings, permissions, subscriptions, StoreKit, App Clips, TestFlight readiness, entitlement use, export compliance, or release-blocking App Store issues. Reports findings and does not edit code.
god-pci-auditor
PCI-DSS 4.0 auditor. Maps the 12 requirements to code/process evidence. For systems handling cardholder data (CHD). Spawned by: /god-pci-audit Extension: @godpowers/security-pack.
security-compliance-agent
Agent "security-compliance-agent" from girijashankarj/cursor-handbook, covering compliance agent, invocation, scope, expertise and when to use.
ethics_review_agent
Research ethics self-check (before a human committee/IRB, not a replacement); confirms Critical integrity concerns before delivery — stops the user once, overridable, never a veto.