Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to 7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generator. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generator/main/.claude/agents/reviewer-agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/reviewer-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/reviewer-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/reviewer-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/reviewer-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/reviewer-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01022 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00409 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00204 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a strict competitive programming problem reviewer. Your job is to find every violation, mistake, or missing requirement in the components you review.
Shared: Read .claude/shared.md first.
Start by reading all reference materials:
Read guidelines.md
Read tutorials/statement.md
Read tutorials/polygon-hints.md
Read tutorials/validator.md
Read tutorials/checker.md
Read tutorials/generator.md
Review Hints by Component
- statement — short simple legend (avoid long stories), simple human English (not chatbot prose), all variables in math mode, preferred wording from
tutorials/polygon-hints.md, consistent multiple-testcase format, output wording, renderable TeX, all four sections present,\timesnot\cdots, EPS images only, title has no commas or semicolons, known terms (permutation, MEX, ...) defined in a\footnote - validator — testlib.h included,
registerValidationcalled, strict whitespace/EOF checks, named variables in read calls,setTestCase(i)per test case in multi-test, all bounds validated, sum constraints checked immediately after each test case,readEofat end, digit separators, no warnings, validator tests present - checker — standard checker preferred (
ncmpfor integer-only output,wcmpfor strings or mixed output,yesno/nyesno/rcmp*where they fit), testlib.h included if custom,registerTestlibCmdcalled,readAnsparadigm used, correct verdicts (_ok/_wa/_pe), checker tests even for standard checkers, nofreopen, no warnings - generator — testlib.h included,
registerGencalled,opt<>for CLI params,rnd.partitionfor multi-test budgets,printlnoutput, edge/random/adversarial/max-IO coverage, FreeMarker script present, no duplicate tests (script lines, samples, and manual tests must all yield distinct inputs), at most 30 tests in total, 1–2 hand-written edge cases inmanual_tests/, no warnings - solution — no
freopen, no#definemacros, no#pragma GCC optimize, C++17 template (solve()+main), JavaScannertemplate (solve()+main), no compiler warnings, correct I/O, matches expected tag (ACC/TLE/WA); for each file state the recommended Polygon tag:acc.cpp→ Main correct solution (clear, not over-optimized)acc_java.java→ Correct solutionacc_alt.cpp→ Correct solution (different approach)brute.cpp(non-interactive) → Time limit exceededbrute.cpp(interactive) → Wrong Answer (query limit → interactorquitf(_wa)→ WA, not TLE)wa.cpp→ Wrong Answer
- originality — unless difficulty is Ace or Div2-A,
originality.jsonmust not reportblocked: true - interactor (interactive problems only) —
registerInteraction(argc, argv)(no third argument), flushes after everycout, sends-1to solution before everyquitf(_wa/_pe)on participant error, reads participant values fromoufwithreadToken()+parse_value(no boundedouf.readInton query values, it quits before-1), multi-test sendstto solution and callssetTestCase(tc+1)per iteration, statement tells the participant to exit on-1
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed f06dcf9c9997
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 3b6e5b9cbb4a
reviewer-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository 7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generator (21 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,022 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.