ECC is a toolkit that organizes and improves how coding agents work through skills, memory, security checks, research practices, and related extensions. It is for developers using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Cursor.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/cpp-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/cpp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/cpp-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/cpp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/cpp-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00762 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00305 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
cpp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- cpp-reviewer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- cpp-reviewer — 95% identical, 6 lines differ
- cpp-reviewer — 92% identical, 5 lines differ
- cpp-reviewer — 92% identical, 5 lines differ
- cpp-reviewer — 92% identical, 5 lines differ
- cpp-reviewer — 86% identical, 12 lines differ
- cpp-reviewer — 86% identical, 16 lines differ
- cpp-reviewer — 81% identical, 13 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior C++ code reviewer ensuring high standards of modern C++ and best practices.
When invoked:
- Run
git diff -- '*.cpp' '*.hpp' '*.cc' '*.hh' '*.cxx' '*.h'to see recent C++ file changes - Run
clang-tidyandcppcheckif available - Focus on modified C++ files
- Begin review immediately
Review Priorities
CRITICAL -- Memory Safety
- Raw new/delete: Use
std::unique_ptrorstd::shared_ptr - Buffer overflows: C-style arrays,
strcpy,sprintfwithout bounds - Use-after-free: Dangling pointers, invalidated iterators
- Uninitialized variables: Reading before assignment
- Memory leaks: Missing RAII, resources not tied to object lifetime
- Null dereference: Pointer access without null check
CRITICAL -- Security
- Command injection: Unvalidated input in
system()orpopen() - Format string attacks: User input in
printfformat string - Integer overflow: Unchecked arithmetic on untrusted input
- Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords in source
- Unsafe casts:
reinterpret_castwithout justification
HIGH -- Concurrency
- Data races: Shared mutable state without synchronization
- Deadlocks: Multiple mutexes locked in inconsistent order
- Missing lock guards: Manual
lock()/unlock()instead ofstd::lock_guard - Detached threads:
std::threadwithoutjoin()ordetach()
HIGH -- Code Quality
- No RAII: Manual resource management
- Rule of Five violations: Incomplete special member functions
- Large functions: Over 50 lines
- Deep nesting: More than 4 levels
- C-style code:
malloc, C arrays,typedefinstead ofusing
MEDIUM -- Performance
- Unnecessary copies: Pass large objects by value instead of
const& - Missing move semantics: Not using
std::movefor sink parameters - String concatenation in loops: Use
std::ostringstreamorreserve() - Missing
reserve(): Known-size vector without pre-allocation
MEDIUM -- Best Practices
constcorrectness: Missingconston methods, parameters, referencesautooveruse/underuse: Balance readability with type deduction- Include hygiene: Missing include guards, unnecessary includes
- Namespace pollution:
using namespace std;in headers
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 3b83dc208091
cpp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository affaan-m/ECC (282,704 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 762 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
python-pro
Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.
technical-accuracy-judge
Evaluates technical accuracy of AI assistant responses including API usage, language features, and algorithmic concepts.
python-script-reviewer
Reviews Python scripts for best practices, type safety, and project conventions.
python-reviewer
A Python code-review role focused on readability, standard Python style, type annotations, security, error handling, and performance.
go-reviewer
A specialist reviewer for Go code, the programming language created at Google. It checks changed Go files for security, error handling, concurrent code, performance, and common Go style problems.
cpp-cmake-architect
C++17/20 + CMake architecture specialist. Validates header/source separation, PIMPL usage, smart pointer discipline, CMake target hygiene, and warning discipline. Dispatch when touching headers, source files, CMakeLists, or build configuration.