Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00782 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00313 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
cpp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to cpp-reviewer — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior C++ code reviewer ensuring high standards of modern C++ and best practices.
When invoked:
- Run
git diff -- '*.cpp' '*.hpp' '*.cc' '*.hh' '*.cxx' '*.h'to see recent C++ file changes - Run
clang-tidyandcppcheckif available - Focus on modified C++ files
- Begin review immediately
Review Priorities
CRITICAL -- Memory Safety
- Raw new/delete: Use
std::unique_ptrorstd::shared_ptr - Buffer overflows: C-style arrays,
strcpy,sprintfwithout bounds - Use-after-free: Dangling pointers, invalidated iterators
- Uninitialized variables: Reading before assignment
- Memory leaks: Missing RAII, resources not tied to object lifetime
- Null dereference: Pointer access without null check
CRITICAL -- Security
- Command injection: Unvalidated input in
system()orpopen() - Format string attacks: User input in
printfformat string - Integer overflow: Unchecked arithmetic on untrusted input
- Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords in source
- Unsafe casts:
reinterpret_castwithout justification
HIGH -- Concurrency
- Data races: Shared mutable state without synchronization
- Deadlocks: Multiple mutexes locked in inconsistent order
- Missing lock guards: Manual
lock()/unlock()instead ofstd::lock_guard - Detached threads:
std::threadwithoutjoin()ordetach()
HIGH -- Code Quality
- No RAII: Manual resource management
- Rule of Five violations: Incomplete special member functions
- Large functions: Over 50 lines
- Deep nesting: More than 4 levels
- C-style code:
malloc, C arrays,typedefinstead ofusing
MEDIUM -- Performance
- Unnecessary copies: Pass large objects by value instead of
const& - Missing move semantics: Not using
std::movefor sink parameters - String concatenation in loops: Use
std::ostringstreamorreserve() - Missing
reserve(): Known-size vector without pre-allocation
MEDIUM -- Best Practices
constcorrectness: Missingconston methods, parameters, referencesautooveruse/underuse: Balance readability with type deduction- Include hygiene: Missing include guards, unnecessary includes
- Namespace pollution:
using namespace std;in headers
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A c54c32cadd27
cpp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (67 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 782 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to cpp-reviewer, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-memory-review
Agent "cpp-memory-review" from Jorgejie/ai_scaffold, covering 1. {{t "cppmemoryreview.jnireftitle"}}, 2. {{t "cppmemoryreview.heaptitle"}}, 3. {{t "cppmemoryreview.buffertitle"}}, 4. {{t "cppmemoryreview.sensitivetitle"}} and 5. {{t "cppmemoryreview.rationalitytitle"}}.
version-compat-scanner
Use this agent to audit Python version compatibility in C extension code, including deprecated API usage, version-guarded code, and pythoncapi-compat opportunities.\n\n \nUser: Check Python version compatibility in my C extension.\nAgent: I will determine the target Python versions, check for unguarded…
c-complexity-analyzer
Use this agent to measure and analyze C code complexity in extension modules, identifying hotspots and suggesting simplifications.\n\n \nUser: What are the most complex functions in this extension?\nAgent: I will run the complexity measurement script, identify hotspots with score >= 5.0, assess inherent vs reducible…
module-state-checker
Use this agent to audit module initialization and state management in C extension code, including single-phase vs multi-phase init and global state migration.\n\n \nUser: Review the module state management in my C extension.\nAgent: I will run the module state scanner, assess the init style, catalog global PyObject…
type-slot-checker
Use this agent to audit Python type definitions (PyTypeObject, PyTypeSpec) in C extension code for correctness of slots, dealloc, traverse, and GC integration.\n\n \nUser: Check the type definitions in my C extension.\nAgent: I will run the type slot scanner, verify dealloc/traverse/GC flag consistency, check…
gil-discipline-checker
Use this agent to audit GIL (Global Interpreter Lock) management in C extension code, including foreign C library interaction and free-threaded Python readiness.\n\n \nUser: Check GIL handling in my C extension that wraps a foreign library.\nAgent: I will run the GIL usage scanner, verify matched…