cpp-reviewer

cpp-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from Fmarzochi/EGC. It costs 41 tokens per session (782 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of cpp-reviewer, Apache-2.0.

A C++ code reviewer focused on memory safety, modern C++ practices, concurrency, security, and performance.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changed C++ files and check issues involving pointers, ownership, synchronization, casts, arithmetic, secrets, and common static-analysis tools.
Why use it?
It helps catch bugs such as memory leaks, buffer overflows, data races, unsafe input handling, and poor resource management.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to review changed C++ files and check issues involving pointers, ownership, synchronization, casts, arithmetic, secrets, and common static-analysis tools.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGC

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cpp-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cpp-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/cpp-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 782 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 95% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.00782
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00313
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00156
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00078

Measured 1mo ago against content hash c54c32cadd27, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cpp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

95% identical to cpp-reviewer — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/cpp-reviewer.md · 74 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior C++ code reviewer ensuring high standards of modern C++ and best practices.

When invoked:

  1. Run git diff -- '*.cpp' '*.hpp' '*.cc' '*.hh' '*.cxx' '*.h' to see recent C++ file changes
  2. Run clang-tidy and cppcheck if available
  3. Focus on modified C++ files
  4. Begin review immediately

Review Priorities

CRITICAL -- Memory Safety

  • Raw new/delete: Use std::unique_ptr or std::shared_ptr
  • Buffer overflows: C-style arrays, strcpy, sprintf without bounds
  • Use-after-free: Dangling pointers, invalidated iterators
  • Uninitialized variables: Reading before assignment
  • Memory leaks: Missing RAII, resources not tied to object lifetime
  • Null dereference: Pointer access without null check

CRITICAL -- Security

  • Command injection: Unvalidated input in system() or popen()
  • Format string attacks: User input in printf format string
  • Integer overflow: Unchecked arithmetic on untrusted input
  • Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords in source
  • Unsafe casts: reinterpret_cast without justification

HIGH -- Concurrency

  • Data races: Shared mutable state without synchronization
  • Deadlocks: Multiple mutexes locked in inconsistent order
  • Missing lock guards: Manual lock()/unlock() instead of std::lock_guard
  • Detached threads: std::thread without join() or detach()

HIGH -- Code Quality

  • No RAII: Manual resource management
  • Rule of Five violations: Incomplete special member functions
  • Large functions: Over 50 lines
  • Deep nesting: More than 4 levels
  • C-style code: malloc, C arrays, typedef instead of using

MEDIUM -- Performance

  • Unnecessary copies: Pass large objects by value instead of const&
  • Missing move semantics: Not using std::move for sink parameters
  • String concatenation in loops: Use std::ostringstream or reserve()
  • Missing reserve(): Known-size vector without pre-allocation

MEDIUM -- Best Practices

  • const correctness: Missing const on methods, parameters, references
  • auto overuse/underuse: Balance readability with type deduction
  • Include hygiene: Missing include guards, unnecessary includes
  • Namespace pollution: using namespace std; in headers

Read the full file on GitHub · 74 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A c54c32cadd27

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cpp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (67 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 782 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to cpp-reviewer, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-memory-review

Agent "cpp-memory-review" from Jorgejie/ai_scaffold, covering 1. {{t "cppmemoryreview.jnireftitle"}}, 2. {{t "cppmemoryreview.heaptitle"}}, 3. {{t "cppmemoryreview.buffertitle"}}, 4. {{t "cppmemoryreview.sensitivetitle"}} and 5. {{t "cppmemoryreview.rationalitytitle"}}.

Jorgejie/ai_scaffold · 8 tokens

version-compat-scanner

Use this agent to audit Python version compatibility in C extension code, including deprecated API usage, version-guarded code, and pythoncapi-compat opportunities.\n\n \nUser: Check Python version compatibility in my C extension.\nAgent: I will determine the target Python versions, check for unguarded…

ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit · 100 tokens

c-complexity-analyzer

Use this agent to measure and analyze C code complexity in extension modules, identifying hotspots and suggesting simplifications.\n\n \nUser: What are the most complex functions in this extension?\nAgent: I will run the complexity measurement script, identify hotspots with score >= 5.0, assess inherent vs reducible…

ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit · 89 tokens

module-state-checker

Use this agent to audit module initialization and state management in C extension code, including single-phase vs multi-phase init and global state migration.\n\n \nUser: Review the module state management in my C extension.\nAgent: I will run the module state scanner, assess the init style, catalog global PyObject…

ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit · 93 tokens

type-slot-checker

Use this agent to audit Python type definitions (PyTypeObject, PyTypeSpec) in C extension code for correctness of slots, dealloc, traverse, and GC integration.\n\n \nUser: Check the type definitions in my C extension.\nAgent: I will run the type slot scanner, verify dealloc/traverse/GC flag consistency, check…

ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit · 98 tokens

gil-discipline-checker

Use this agent to audit GIL (Global Interpreter Lock) management in C extension code, including foreign C library interaction and free-threaded Python readiness.\n\n \nUser: Check GIL handling in my C extension that wraps a foreign library.\nAgent: I will run the GIL usage scanner, verify matched…

ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit · 108 tokens