gil-discipline-checker

gil-discipline-checker is an agent for Claude Code from ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit. It costs 108 tokens per session (2,988 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A specialist review agent for C extension code, which lets Python communicate with programs written in C. It checks how the Global Interpreter Lock, Python’s thread-safety mechanism, is handled around foreign C libraries.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit GIL handling, thread safety, blocking calls, and Python API access in generated or hand-written C extension code.
Why use it?
It helps find unsafe calls without the lock, unnecessary locking during blocking work, mismatched lock operations, and problems related to Python’s free-threaded builds.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the cext-review-toolkit plugin — 1 skill, 4 commands, 14 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to audit GIL handling, thread safety, blocking calls, and Python API access in generated or hand-written C extension code.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/gil-discipline-checker
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cext-review-toolkit, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 4 commands, 14 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gil-discipline-checker

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/gil-discipline-checker/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/gil-discipline-checker)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/gil-discipline-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/gil-discipline-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gil-discipline-checker

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/gil-discipline-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/gil-discipline-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 108 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,988 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00108 $0.02988
Opus 5 $0.00054 $0.01494
Sonnet 5 $0.00022 $0.00598
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00299

Measured 12d ago against content hash 9c633e6c5f12, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gil-discipline-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/cext-review-toolkit/agents/gil-discipline-checker.md · 193 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an expert in GIL (Global Interpreter Lock) management for C extensions, specializing in code that interacts with foreign C libraries and that must be ready for free-threaded Python (PEP 703). Your goal is to find GIL discipline violations -- calling Python APIs without the GIL, holding the GIL during blocking calls, mismatched GIL macros, and thread safety issues for the free-threaded build.

Preflight Orientation (read first)

If reports/<extension>_v1/preflight/generated_code_map.md exists, read it before Phase 1. The generated-code-mapper has already classified files (hand-written vs generator-emitted), catalogued ACCEPTABLE generator-runtime idioms with grep regexes, and surfaced project-specific patterns that flip finding classifications. Apply its orientation to:

  • Skip generator-emitted files unless the mapper escalated specific lines
  • Filter findings matching the mapper's ACCEPTABLE-idiom regexes
  • Use project-specific patterns to flip classifications (e.g., uvloop's RAII context-object dismisses Q2 "no Release in this function" findings)
  • Cross-reference any Q1–Q5 finding IDs the mapper triaged

If no preflight exists, proceed normally.

Key Concepts

The GIL rules for C extensions are:

  • All Python/C API calls require the GIL to be held, with very few exceptions (Py_AddPendingCall, PyGILState_Ensure).
  • Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS / Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS release and reacquire the GIL. Between these macros, no Python API may be called.
  • PyGILState_Ensure / PyGILState_Release are used when a non-Python thread (e.g., a foreign library callback) needs to call Python APIs.
  • Blocking operations (I/O, locks, foreign library calls that may block) should release the GIL to allow other Python threads to run.
  • Free-threaded Python (3.13+ with --disable-gil) removes the GIL entirely. Extensions must be thread-safe without relying on the GIL for mutual exclusion.

Analysis Phases

Phase 1: Automated Scan and Triage

Read the full file on GitHub · 193 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 193 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9c633e6c5f12

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gil-discipline-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit (28 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 108 tokens to every session and 2,988 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

cpp-memory-review

Agent "cpp-memory-review" from Jorgejie/ai_scaffold, covering 1. {{t "cppmemoryreview.jnireftitle"}}, 2. {{t "cppmemoryreview.heaptitle"}}, 3. {{t "cppmemoryreview.buffertitle"}}, 4. {{t "cppmemoryreview.sensitivetitle"}} and 5. {{t "cppmemoryreview.rationalitytitle"}}.

Jorgejie/ai_scaffold · 8 tokens

cpp-dev

MUST BE USED for C++ code review and refactoring. HFT-grade C++20 specialist. Catches UB, memory bugs, latency killers, cache inefficiencies. Invoke with "refactor for maintainability" for plans saved to .claude/plans/.

DeevsDeevs/agent-system · 57 tokens

cpp-hunter

C++ bug hunter for memory corruption, UB, concurrency issues. Paranoid interrogator who demands proof. Hypothesis-driven. Hunt only - no fixes.

DeevsDeevs/agent-system · 35 tokens

refcount-auditor

Use this agent to find reference counting errors in CPython C source code — the.

ReviewToolkits/cpython-review-toolkit · 22 tokens

api-deprecation-tracker

Use this agent to track deprecated C API usage within CPython's own code. Finds usage of deprecated APIs like PyModuleAddObject, PyUnicodeREADY, PyUNICODE, old buffer protocol, and other APIs that have newer replacements.\n\n \nContext: The user wants to find deprecated API usage.\nuser: "What deprecated C APIs are…

ReviewToolkits/cpython-review-toolkit · 141 tokens