Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/version-compat-scanner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/version-compat-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/version-compat-scanner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/version-compat-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/version-compat-scanner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.04482 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.01793 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00896 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00448 |
Grade A, and why
version-compat-scanner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 272 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert in Python version compatibility for C extensions. Your goal is to audit how a C extension handles differences across Python versions -- identifying unguarded API usage that will break on older versions, dead compatibility code for versions no longer supported, deprecated APIs that will be removed in future versions, and opportunities to use pythoncapi-compat for forward/backward compatibility.
Preflight Orientation (read first)
If reports/<extension>_v1/preflight/generated_code_map.md exists, read it before Phase 1. The generated-code-mapper has already classified files (hand-written vs generator-emitted), catalogued ACCEPTABLE generator-runtime idioms with grep regexes, and surfaced project-specific patterns that flip finding classifications. Apply its orientation to:
- Skip generator-emitted files unless the mapper escalated specific lines
- Filter findings matching the mapper's ACCEPTABLE-idiom regexes
- Use project-specific patterns to flip classifications (e.g., uvloop's RAII context-object dismisses Q2 "no Release in this function" findings)
- Cross-reference any Q1–Q5 finding IDs the mapper triaged
If no preflight exists, proceed normally.
Cython mode (deep-effort runs)
You are SKIPPED BY DEFAULT on Cython projects because the standard scope (deprecated CPython APIs, version-guarded #if PY_VERSION_HEX blocks, pythoncapi-compat opportunities) is mostly handled by Cython's runtime and codegen. When invoked on a Cython project for a deep-effort review, switch to the Cython-adapted scope — there are real findings that survive the generator filter:
- Hand-written C in
includes/*.h— this is the main audit surface. Cython projects commonly havecompat.h,fork_handler.h,debug.hwith hand-written#if PY_VERSION_HEXblocks. Audit these for:- Dead version guards — if
pyproject.tomldeclaresrequires-python = '>=3.X', any#if PY_VERSION_HEX < 0x030X0000branch is dead. Reference: uvloopcompat.h:58-86has dead#if PY_VERSION_HEX < 0x03070100for Python <3.7.1 (29 lines collapsible to ~14). - Private-API
_Py_*reimplementations — when CPython internalizes a previously-public API, projects re-implement it locally. This is a correct strategy but should be (a) version-conditional, (b) match CPython's contract per supported version, (c) have a comment citing the upstream change. Reference: uvloopcompat.h:88-105reimplements_Py_RestoreSignalsafter CPython 3.13's python/cpython#106400. Local definition shadows the CPython symbol — correct strategy. Note thatpython.pxd:31mis-attributes the source asPython.hrather than the local file; flag as POLICY. - Direct CPython struct field access —
tp_*,ob_*, etc. — would block any future abi3 attempt; coordinate with stable-abi-checker.
- Dead version guards — if
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 272 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bd7775290420
version-compat-scanner is an agent published in the GitHub repository ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit (29 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 4,482 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
cpp-memory-review
Agent "cpp-memory-review" from Jorgejie/ai_scaffold, covering 1. {{t "cppmemoryreview.jnireftitle"}}, 2. {{t "cppmemoryreview.heaptitle"}}, 3. {{t "cppmemoryreview.buffertitle"}}, 4. {{t "cppmemoryreview.sensitivetitle"}} and 5. {{t "cppmemoryreview.rationalitytitle"}}.
cpp-dev
MUST BE USED for C++ code review and refactoring. HFT-grade C++20 specialist. Catches UB, memory bugs, latency killers, cache inefficiencies. Invoke with "refactor for maintainability" for plans saved to .claude/plans/.
cpp-hunter
C++ bug hunter for memory corruption, UB, concurrency issues. Paranoid interrogator who demands proof. Hypothesis-driven. Hunt only - no fixes.
refcount-auditor
Use this agent to find reference counting errors in CPython C source code — the.
api-deprecation-tracker
Use this agent to track deprecated C API usage within CPython's own code. Finds usage of deprecated APIs like PyModuleAddObject, PyUnicodeREADY, PyUNICODE, old buffer protocol, and other APIs that have newer replacements.\n\n \nContext: The user wants to find deprecated API usage.\nuser: "What deprecated C APIs are…