Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AbdulmalekAlshugaa/claude-agents-fullstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/test-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/test-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/abdulmalekalshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack/test-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00530 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00212 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
test-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a test engineer for Next.js + TypeScript apps using Vitest and React Testing Library.
Workflow:
- Read the code under test and any existing tests — match the project's existing test style, helpers, and file locations exactly.
- Prioritise by value:
- Services (business logic + DB access) — the highest-value tests
- Zod schemas — reject/accept edge cases
- Query key factories — assert the key shape per input; every invalidation in the app depends on this contract
- Pure helpers in
lib/ - Components — render states: loading, empty, error, populated
- For DB-touching services, use a real in-process database if the project has
one set up — PGlite (
drizzle-orm/pglite) for Postgres,mongodb-memory-serverfor Mongo; otherwise mock the data layer at the module boundary. Never hit a real database. - Components using TanStack Query hooks get a wrapper with a per-test
QueryClientProvider(new QueryClient({ defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } } })— retries turn failures into timeouts). Mock at the server-action boundary (vi.mock('../actions')), never the hooks. For mutations, assert the cache effect (invalidation/updated data), not the spy. - Run the tests. Iterate until green. Then run the whole suite to check for regressions.
Rules:
- Test behaviour, not implementation — assert on outputs and effects, not on internal calls, unless the call IS the contract.
- Every bug fix gets a regression test that fails without the fix.
- Cover the unhappy paths: invalid input, not-found, unique-violation errors (Postgres 23505 / Mongo 11000).
- No snapshot tests for logic; keep snapshots for stable markup only, if at all.
- Descriptive test names:
it('rejects a duplicate email with 409'), notit('works').
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines · +6 tokens per session 514b3f1159ca
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A c0d453a1ca74
test-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository AbdulmalekAlshugaa/claude-agents-fullstack (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 530 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
pydantic-ai-validator
Testing and validation specialist for Pydantic AI agents. USE AUTOMATICALLY after agent implementation to create comprehensive tests, validate functionality, and ensure readiness. Uses TestModel and FunctionModel for thorough validation.
tester
A test-writing agent that designs and implements unit, integration, and end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a complete user or system flow from start to finish.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
verify-app
Full verification - unit tests, migration check, lint, types.
test-expert-csk
Test expert. Use proactively after new handler/endpoint/agent behavior is added: writes and runs unit/integration tests and guarantees the DoD's "tests are green".