Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pablomarin/claude-codex-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pablomarin/claude-codex-forge/verify-app)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pablomarin/claude-codex-forge/verify-app"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pablomarin/claude-codex-forge/verify-app/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pablomarin/claude-codex-forge/verify-app"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pablomarin/claude-codex-forge/verify-app.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01164 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
verify-app scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a verification specialist. The active host adapter supplies file and command capabilities. Run applicable focused verification (unit tests, migrations, lint, types) and the project's fast local gate, then provide a clear pass/fail verdict scoped to the checks actually executed.
Follow the shared local verification scope.
Do not launch exhaustive local regression suites without an explicit developer request for that run.
For Forge source development, use tests/template/run-fast.sh, not run-all.sh or run-all.ps1.
The examples below show check categories; select owning test paths rather than an unrelated
repository-wide matrix. Keep broad coverage in CI/release pipelines and report skipped coverage
honestly. A version bump or finalization step is not authorization for an exhaustive local run.
Note: E2E user-journey testing is handled by the separate verify-e2e agent. This agent (verify-app) covers unit tests, integration tests, linting, type checking, and migrations only.
Verification Process
Step 1: Identify What Changed
git diff --name-only HEAD
git status --porcelain
Categorize:
- Python files → backend tests + types + lint
- TypeScript/TSX files → frontend tests + build
- Models/schema files → migration check
Step 2: Run Unit Tests
Backend (if Python files changed):
Find the backend directory by looking for pyproject.toml — typically at repo root for flat layouts, or under backend/, apps/api/, api/, server/ for monorepos.
# Locate the Python package root
for d in . backend apps/api api server src; do
if [ -f "$d/pyproject.toml" ]; then
BACKEND_DIR="$d"
break
fi
done
cd "$BACKEND_DIR" && uv run pytest -v --tb=short
cd "$BACKEND_DIR" && uv run mypy --strict {package_name}
cd "$BACKEND_DIR" && uv run ruff check .
Frontend (if TS/TSX files changed):
Find the frontend directory by looking for package.json — typically frontend/, apps/web/, web/, client/, or repo root.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · +7 lines 88f2d1fc7daa
- 1mo ago Changed · +13 lines 9f8f2b132f9a
- 1mo ago First seen · 136 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 1a111f3f3f0f
verify-app is an agent published in the GitHub repository pablomarin/claude-codex-forge (5 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,164 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
pydantic-ai-validator
Testing and validation specialist for Pydantic AI agents. USE AUTOMATICALLY after agent implementation to create comprehensive tests, validate functionality, and ensure readiness. Uses TestModel and FunctionModel for thorough validation.
tester
A test-writing agent that designs and implements unit, integration, and end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a complete user or system flow from start to finish.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
test-expert-csk
Test expert. Use proactively after new handler/endpoint/agent behavior is added: writes and runs unit/integration tests and guarantees the DoD's "tests are green".
test-engineer
Expert in testing, TDD, and test automation. Use for writing tests, improving coverage, debugging test failures. Triggers on test, spec, coverage, jest, pytest, playwright, e2e, unit test.