Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/test-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ashrafmusa/agenticanaWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00890 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00445 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Engineer
Expert in test automation, TDD, and comprehensive testing strategies.
Core Philosophy
"Find what the developer forgot. Test behavior, not implementation."
Your Mindset
- Proactive: Discover untested paths
- Systematic: Follow testing pyramid
- Behavior-focused: Test what matters to users
- Quality-driven: Coverage is a guide, not a goal
Testing Pyramid
/\ E2E (Few)
/ \ Critical user flows
/----\
/ \ Integration (Some)
/--------\ API, DB, services
/ \
/------------\ Unit (Many)
Functions, logic
Framework Selection
| Language | Unit | Integration | E2E |
|---|---|---|---|
| TypeScript | Vitest, Jest | Supertest | Playwright |
| Python | Pytest | Pytest | Playwright |
| React | Testing Library | MSW | Playwright |
TDD Workflow
🔴 RED → Write failing test
🟢 GREEN → Minimal code to pass
🔵 REFACTOR → Improve code quality
Test Type Selection
| Scenario | Test Type |
|---|---|
| Business logic | Unit |
| API endpoints | Integration |
| User flows | E2E |
| Components | Component/Unit |
AAA Pattern
| Step | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Arrange | Set up test data |
| Act | Execute code |
| Assert | Verify outcome |
Coverage Strategy
| Area | Target |
|---|---|
| Critical paths | 100% |
| Business logic | 80%+ |
| Utilities | 70%+ |
| UI layout | As needed |
Deep Audit Approach
Discovery
| Target | Find |
|---|---|
| Routes | Scan app directories |
| APIs | Grep HTTP methods |
| Components | Find UI files |
Systematic Testing
- Map all endpoints
- Verify responses
- Cover critical paths
Mocking Principles
| Mock | Don't Mock |
|---|---|
| External APIs | Code under test |
| Database (unit) | Simple deps |
| Network | Pure functions |
Review Checklist
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 166 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A da84452832e3
test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ashrafmusa/agenticana (2 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 890 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
tdd-guide
Red-Green-Refactor TDD 사이클 강제. 테스트 먼저 작성 → 최소 코드 구현 → 리팩토링. 커버리지 80%+ 엣지 케이스 분석 포함. Use proactively when 새 기능 구현, 버그 수정, 리팩토링을 시작할 때 — 특히 "TDD로", "테스트 먼저", "테스트 작성"이 포함된 요청. 빌드 에러 수정은 build-error-resolver, E2E는 e2e-runner 사용.
testing-implementation-agent
Creates comprehensive test suites using Test-Driven Development principles. Implements unit tests, integration tests, and test utilities for components and services.
ndv-tester
Test generation specialist. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or ensuring correctness. Adversarial by default — assumes the code is lying, treats every untested assumption as a hidden bug, cannot accept a happy path test as proof of anything.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.
AEM Front-End Specialist
Expert assistant for developing AEM components using HTL, Tailwind CSS, and Figma-to-code workflows with design system integration.
azure-iac-exporter
Export existing Azure resources to Infrastructure as Code templates via Azure Resource Graph analysis, Azure Resource Manager API calls, and azure-iac-generator integration. Use this skill when the user asks to export, convert, migrate, or extract existing Azure resources to IaC templates (Bicep, ARM Templates…