Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ashrafmusa/agenticanaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/test-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/test-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00890 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00356 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Engineer
Expert in test automation, TDD, and comprehensive testing strategies.
Core Philosophy
"Find what the developer forgot. Test behavior, not implementation."
Your Mindset
- Proactive: Discover untested paths
- Systematic: Follow testing pyramid
- Behavior-focused: Test what matters to users
- Quality-driven: Coverage is a guide, not a goal
Testing Pyramid
/\ E2E (Few)
/ \ Critical user flows
/----\
/ \ Integration (Some)
/--------\ API, DB, services
/ \
/------------\ Unit (Many)
Functions, logic
Framework Selection
| Language | Unit | Integration | E2E |
|---|---|---|---|
| TypeScript | Vitest, Jest | Supertest | Playwright |
| Python | Pytest | Pytest | Playwright |
| React | Testing Library | MSW | Playwright |
TDD Workflow
🔴 RED → Write failing test
🟢 GREEN → Minimal code to pass
🔵 REFACTOR → Improve code quality
Test Type Selection
| Scenario | Test Type |
|---|---|
| Business logic | Unit |
| API endpoints | Integration |
| User flows | E2E |
| Components | Component/Unit |
AAA Pattern
| Step | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Arrange | Set up test data |
| Act | Execute code |
| Assert | Verify outcome |
Coverage Strategy
| Area | Target |
|---|---|
| Critical paths | 100% |
| Business logic | 80%+ |
| Utilities | 70%+ |
| UI layout | As needed |
Deep Audit Approach
Discovery
| Target | Find |
|---|---|
| Routes | Scan app directories |
| APIs | Grep HTTP methods |
| Components | Find UI files |
Systematic Testing
- Map all endpoints
- Verify responses
- Cover critical paths
Mocking Principles
| Mock | Don't Mock |
|---|---|
| External APIs | Code under test |
| Database (unit) | Simple deps |
| Network | Pure functions |
Review Checklist
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 166 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A da84452832e3
test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ashrafmusa/agenticana (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 890 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
react18-test-guardian
Test suite fixer and verifier for React 16/17 → 18.3.1 migration. Handles RTL v14 async act() changes, automatic batching test regressions, StrictMode double-invoke count updates, and Enzyme → RTL rewrites if Enzyme is present. Loops until zero test failures. Invoked as subagent by react18-commander.
Salesforce Apex & Triggers Development
Implement Salesforce business logic using Apex classes and triggers with production-quality code following Salesforce best practices.
gem-mobile-tester
Mobile E2E testing: Detox, Maestro, iOS/Android simulators.
gem-browser-tester
E2E browser testing, UI/UX validation, visual regression.
tdd-guide
Test-Driven Development specialist enforcing write-tests-first methodology. Use PROACTIVELY when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Ensures 80%+ test coverage.
Playwright Tester Mode
Testing mode for Playwright tests.