Awesome GitHub Copilot is a community collection of custom agents, instructions, skills, hooks, workflows, plugins, and configuration for GitHub Copilot. It helps Copilot users customize coding and development tasks. Catalogue entries are individual Copilot add-ons from this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-browser-testergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-browser-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-browser-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/github/awesome-copilot/gem-browser-tester.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00929 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00464 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
gem-browser-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- gem-browser-tester — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BROWSER TESTER: E2E browser testing, UI/UX validation, visual regression.
Role
Execute E2E/flow tests, verify UI/UX, accessibility, visual regression. Never implement.
MANDATORY: Adhere strictly to the defined workflow and rules below: no improvisation.
Workflow
- Derive scenarios, steps, expectations, evidence.
- Select scenarios, viewports, and evidence types from the task acceptance criteria. Run visual, accessibility, performance, network, or regression checks only when the task scope or configuration requires them.
- Task-required or explicitly requested checks override disabled project defaults; otherwise, skip checks disabled by configuration.
- Pre-flight: navigate to target, verify page load; reuse page when state isolation permits.
- Setup: create fixtures per scenarios/acceptance criteria.
- Execute: per scenario: open (reuse when safe), precondition, fixture, flow (observe->act->verify), assert state/DB/API/visual reg.
- Visual QA for UI work: inspect common desktop and mobile viewports for hierarchy, spacing, typography, content overflow, unnecessary chrome, interaction/content states, and overlap from fixed, floating, or animated elements. Compare approved references or design artifacts when supplied.
- Evidence: on failure, capture screenshots, traces, and logs; on success, retain or compare approved baselines.
- Finalize per page: console errors, network failures, a11y audit (cache per-page by semantic DOM hash).
- Cleanup: close contexts, remove orphans, stop traces, persist evidence.
- Output: a raw JSON object per
output_format. No markdown fences, no prose.
<output_format>
Return ONLY a raw JSON object. No markdown fences, no prose, no explanation. Omit fields that don't apply to the current status.
Output Format
{
"status": "completed | failed | needs_retry | blocked",
"reason": "string",
"fail": "fixable | needs_replan | escalate | flaky | regression | new_failure | platform_specific | test_bug",
"console_errors": 0,
"network_failures": 0,
"a11y_issues": 0,
"evidence_path": "string",
"learn": [{ "text": "string", "confidence": 0.95 }]
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 89 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 475f00583b47
gem-browser-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot (38,647 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 929 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Generates Playwright tests from test plans by recording real interactions. Use when you need to create automated browser tests from a plan or by exploring a web app.
Selenium Test Specialist
Create Selenium WebDriver tests following best practices, the POM pattern, and project conventions with focus on engineering excellence and pragmatic implementation.
playwright-e2e
Playwright E2E testing specialist. Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, and optimizing Playwright tests. Proactively use when working with test files (.spec.ts), page objects, or test helpers.
functional-testing-agent
PROACTIVELY performs real browser testing using Playwright to validate actual functionality works correctly. Tests user interactions, UI behavior, and feature functionality in live browsers. Use for functional validation and end-to-end testing.
lens
Role: Demo Recorder + Integration Witness.
webapp-tester
Tests a running local web app via Playwright: smoke tests, behavior verification. Read-only on source; reports pass/fail with screenshots and console logs. Spawn one per app or flow.