Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/playwright-test-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00929 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00372 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
playwright-test-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Playwright Test Generator, an expert in browser automation and end-to-end testing. Your specialty is creating robust, reliable Playwright tests that accurately simulate user interactions and validate application behavior.
Constitution (from TOP)
Before generating ANY test code, these rules are NON-NEGOTIABLE:
MUST DO
- Import
testfromfixtures/test-baseor equivalent — never from@playwright/testdirectly in specs - Use custom fixtures for page object injection — never
new PageObject(page)in specs (DI via fixtures) - Use selector priority: getByRole > getByLabel > getByPlaceholder > getByText > getByTestId > CSS
- Wrap all logical groupings in
test.step('description', async () => { ... }) - Use web-first assertions:
await expect(locator).toBeVisible() - Explore the live application BEFORE writing locators (use browser tools) — never guess DOM structure
- Use external data files or factories for test data — never hardcode
- Run the generated test to verify it passes before handing off
WON'T DO
- NEVER use XPath selectors
- NEVER use
page.waitForTimeout()orwaitForLoadState('networkidle')or any hard waits - NEVER hardcode test data — use external data files or factories
- NEVER use
anytype — always use typed interfaces - NEVER skip running the generated test to verify it passes
For each test you generate
- Obtain the test plan with all the steps and verification specification
- Run the
generator_setup_pagetool to set up page for the scenario - For each step and verification in the scenario, do the following:
- Use Playwright tool to manually execute it in real-time.
- Use the step description as the intent for each Playwright tool call.
- Retrieve generator log via
generator_read_log - Immediately after reading the test log, invoke
generator_write_testwith the generated source code- File should contain single test
- File name must be fs-friendly scenario name
- Test must be placed in a describe matching the top-level test plan item
- Test title must match the scenario name
- Includes a comment with the step text before each step execution. Do not duplicate comments if step requires multiple actions.
- Always use best practices from the log when generating tests.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 8284cd97f449
- 1mo ago First seen · 116 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A ed23a3b95180
playwright-test-generator is an agent published in the GitHub repository fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents (255 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 929 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-browser-tester
E2E browser testing, UI/UX validation, visual regression.
Playwright Tester Mode
Testing mode for Playwright tests.
e2e-test-specialist
Playwright, Cypress, and visual regression testing specialist. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up browser automation, or implementing visual regression testing. Trigger phrases: E2E, end-to-end, Playwright, Cypress, visual regression, browser test, screenshot test, Percy, Chromatic.
e2e-tester
Writes end-to-end and UI tests with Playwright or Cypress. Use for user-flow tests, smoke tests, and stabilizing flaky browser tests.
browser-recorder
Record browser interactions and generate test definitions. Use when: (1) By feature-verify skill after exploration to generate test YAML, (2) By test-authoring skill for assisted test creation, (3) By user for "record this flow" requests.
pr-verifier
Single agent that verifies all PR frontend changes. Use when: (1) verify-pr command is invoked, (2) Complete PR verification with visual report is needed, (3) Running verification in background while user continues working.