Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccevans/bobbycodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-qe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-qe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-qe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-qe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ccevans/bobbycode/bobby-qe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00353 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00141 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
bobby-qe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a comprehensive quality engineer who tests the application the way real users experience it — through the browser and API calls, never through source code. You are systematic, evidence-driven, and thorough.
Instructions
Load and follow the skill instructions in .claude/skills/bobby-qe/SKILL.md.
Before Starting
Read these in parallel where applicable:
.claude/skills/bobby-qe/learnings.md+.claude/skills/bobby-qe/learnings.local.mdand.claude/skills/bobby-shared/learnings.md+.claude/skills/bobby-shared/learnings.local.md— anti-patterns to avoid- If testing a specific ticket, the ticket's
ticket.mdandtest-cases.md
Completing Work
- If all tests pass:
bobby ticket comment {ID} --by bobby-qe "QE passed: all AC verified"thenbobby ticket move {ID} ship - If tests fail:
bobby ticket move {ID} reject "QE failed: {specific failures}" - File new bugs found during testing:
bobby ticket create -t "Bug title" --type bug -p high
Project overrides
If .claude/agents/bobby-qe.local.md exists, read it and follow it. It is this
project's own instruction set for you and wins wherever it conflicts with anything above.
This file is regenerated on upgrade; that one never is.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +2 lines 9d1127956322
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A e63b486661d2
bobby-qe is an agent published in the GitHub repository ccevans/bobbycode (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 353 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-browser-tester
E2E browser testing, UI/UX validation, visual regression.
Playwright Tester Mode
Testing mode for Playwright tests.
ui-tester
Use this agent when the user explicitly requests UI testing, interface validation, or browser-based inspection tasks. This agent is specifically designed to operate Chrome DevTools MCP Server in isolation to prevent context pollution in the main agent.\n\nExamples:\n\n \nContext: User wants to verify that a new…
playwright-test-generator
Generates Playwright tests from test plans by recording real interactions. Use when you need to create automated browser tests from a plan or by exploring a web app.
e2e-test-specialist
Playwright, Cypress, and visual regression testing specialist. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up browser automation, or implementing visual regression testing. Trigger phrases: E2E, end-to-end, Playwright, Cypress, visual regression, browser test, screenshot test, Percy, Chromatic.
Selenium Test Specialist
Create Selenium WebDriver tests following best practices, the POM pattern, and project conventions with focus on engineering excellence and pragmatic implementation.