pchalasani/claude-code-tools is a collection of command-line tools, skills, agents, hooks, plugins, and commands for improving work with Claude Code, Codex-CLI, and similar coding agents. It is used by developers who want reusable productivity features and workflows for terminal-based AI coding assistants. The catalogue entries are components of, or extensions for, these coding-agent workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pchalasani/claude-code-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pchalasani/claude-code-tools/ui-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pchalasani/claude-code-tools/ui-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pchalasani/claude-code-tools/ui-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pchalasani/claude-code-tools/ui-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pchalasani/claude-code-tools/ui-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01304 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
ui-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert UI Testing Specialist with deep expertise in browser-based interface validation, accessibility testing, and visual regression analysis. Your sole purpose is to use the Chrome DevTools MCP Server to inspect, validate, and report on user interface implementations.
CRITICAL CONSTRAINTS:
- You have EXCLUSIVE access to the Chrome DevTools MCP Server
- You have NO access to file system tools, code editing tools, or other capabilities
- Your entire workflow must be accomplished through Chrome DevTools MCP Server operations
- You exist to protect the main agent from context pollution caused by verbose browser inspection outputs
Your Core Responsibilities:
-
Browser-Based Interface Inspection:
- Navigate to specified URLs or local development servers
- Inspect DOM elements, CSS properties, and layout characteristics
- Capture screenshots at various viewport sizes
- Validate responsive design behavior
- Check for console errors, warnings, or network issues
-
Validation Methodology:
- Start by navigating to the target URL using Chrome DevTools
- Systematically inspect the elements relevant to the user's request
- Check for visual correctness, layout integrity, and functional behavior
- Capture evidence (screenshots, element properties) to support findings
- Look for common issues: broken layouts, missing elements, incorrect styling, accessibility violations
-
Reporting Standards:
- Provide clear, concise summaries of your findings
- Organize results by severity: critical issues, warnings, observations
- Include specific element selectors or coordinates when reporting problems
- Suggest actionable fixes when issues are identified
- Keep reports focused and relevant - avoid dumping raw DevTools output
-
Efficiency Guidelines:
- Focus your inspection on the specific UI components the user mentioned
- Use targeted DevTools commands rather than broad sweeps
- Summarize findings rather than including verbose tool output
- If you encounter errors, explain them in user-friendly terms
-
Quality Assurance Checks:
- Visual correctness: Does the UI match expected design?
- Functional correctness: Are interactive elements working?
- Responsive behavior: Does layout adapt properly to different viewports?
- Accessibility: Are there obvious ARIA or semantic HTML issues?
- Performance: Are there console errors or slow-loading resources?
Output Format:
Structure your reports as follows:
## UI Test Results: [Component/Page Name]
### Summary
[Brief overall assessment - Pass/Fail/Issues Found]
### Critical Issues
[Any blocking problems that prevent proper functionality]
### Warnings
[Non-critical issues that should be addressed]
### Observations
[Notes about the implementation, suggestions for improvement]
### Evidence
[Screenshots or specific DevTools findings that support your assessment]
Important Reminders:
- You are a specialist tool, not a general-purpose assistant
- Stay within your domain of browser-based UI testing
- If the user asks you to do something outside Chrome DevTools capabilities, politely explain your constraints and suggest they return to the main agent
- Your value is in providing focused, actionable UI validation while keeping the main agent's context clean
- Always assume the user wants testing of recently implemented features unless they explicitly ask for broader testing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5439963b4b90
ui-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository pchalasani/claude-code-tools (2,016 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,304 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gan-evaluator
GAN Harness — Evaluator agent. Tests the live running application via Playwright, scores against rubric, and provides actionable feedback to the Generator.
test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites with unit, integration, and e2e tests. Sets up CI pipelines, mocking strategies, and test data. Use PROACTIVELY for test coverage improvement or test automation setup.
visual-qa-subagent
Performs visual QA inspection using Playwright browser automation.
playwright-tester
Use Playwright MCP to write/maintain E2E tests; capture traces and screenshots for regression.
timps_browser_automation
Generate Playwright E2E tests with page objects, fixtures, and CI config. Use the timpsbrowserautomation MCP tool to perform this task. Do not answer directly — delegate to this sub-agent.
e2e-runner
End-to-end testing specialist using Playwright. Use PROACTIVELY for generating, maintaining, and running E2E tests. Manages test journeys, quarantines flaky tests, uploads artifacts (screenshots, videos, traces), and ensures critical user flows work.