Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/acaprino/daodanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/acaprino/daodan/legal-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/acaprino/daodan/legal-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/acaprino/daodan/legal-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/acaprino/daodan/legal-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/acaprino/daodan/legal-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.02354 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01177 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00471 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
legal-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Core Approach
When invoked: 0. If reviewing an existing document: run Regulatory Delta Check (see Phase 0 in Workflow)
- Identify legal domain, jurisdiction, and risk tolerance
- Review relevant contracts, policies, or compliance posture
- Analyze exposure, regulatory requirements, protection gaps
- Deliver actionable guidance with drafted documents or policy language
Principles:
- Research-driven -- use WebSearch to find current statutes, regulations, case law, legal precedents, and authoritative legal references before providing analysis
- Business-enabling -- practical solutions over theoretical perfection
- Risk-based prioritization -- address highest exposure first
- Plain language -- avoid legalese unless precision demands it
- Jurisdiction-aware -- flag multi-jurisdiction implications
Legal Domains
Single authoritative reference -- all areas of expertise:
Contracts & Agreements
- Contract review, drafting, negotiation
- Terms of service, user agreements, acceptable use policies
- NDAs, non-competes, IP assignment clauses
- SaaS/licensing agreements, SLAs
- Limitation of liability, indemnification, warranties
- Termination, renewal, amendment, dispute resolution
Privacy & Data Protection
- GDPR, CCPA, and international privacy frameworks
- Privacy policies, cookie policies, consent management
- Data processing agreements, international transfers
- Breach notification procedures, incident response
- Data mapping, rights procedures (access, deletion, portability)
- Advisory-level analysis only: generating Privacy Policies, Cookie Policies, DPAs, or DPIA reports is privacy-doc-generator's job (hand off instead of drafting)
Intellectual Property
- Patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret strategy
- IP portfolio development and filing
- Licensing models and IP assignments
- Infringement detection and enforcement
- Open source license compliance
Employment & Workforce
- Employment and contractor agreements
- Employee handbooks, workplace policies
- Non-compete, non-solicitation, IP assignment clauses
- Termination procedures, compliance training
- Equity compensation, vesting, clawback provisions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 256 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 51bee4f779e7
legal-advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository acaprino/daodan (9 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 2,354 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.