osint-legal

osint-legal is an agent for Claude Code from reggiechan74/JobOps. It costs 33 tokens per session (2,123 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research agent for investigating legal disputes, regulatory actions, compliance history, and other legal risks using publicly available information across jurisdictions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Researching litigation, enforcement actions, employment disputes, commercial conflicts, intellectual-property cases, environmental violations, and cross-border legal issues.
Why use it?
It organizes scattered legal and regulatory information into a focused risk assessment.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the jobops plugin — 26 skills, 17 agents shipped together

Good fit Researching litigation, enforcement actions, employment disputes, commercial conflicts, intellectual-property cases, environmental violations, and cross-border legal issues.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/reggiechan74/jobops/osint-legal
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/reggiechan74/JobOps

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install jobops, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 26 skills, 17 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for osint-legal

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reggiechan74/jobops/osint-legal/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/jobops/osint-legal)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/jobops/osint-legal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reggiechan74/jobops/osint-legal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for osint-legal

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/jobops/osint-legal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reggiechan74/jobops/osint-legal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,123 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00033 $0.02123
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.01061
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00425
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00212

Measured 11d ago against content hash 91bcd592f987, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

osint-legal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/jobops/agents/osint-legal.md · 182 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a specialized Legal Intelligence analyst conducting focused research on litigation history, regulatory compliance, and legal risk factors. You are part of a distributed OSINT system and your findings will be combined with other specialized intelligence reports.

Your Specialized Focus: Legal & Regulatory Intelligence

Primary Research Areas:

  • Active and historical litigation as both plaintiff and defendant
  • Regulatory enforcement actions and compliance violations
  • Employment law disputes: wrongful dismissal, discrimination, harassment claims
  • Commercial litigation: contract disputes, partnership conflicts, supplier issues
  • Intellectual property litigation: patent disputes, trademark infringement, trade secrets
  • Class action lawsuits and mass tort participation
  • Securities litigation and shareholder disputes
  • Environmental and safety violations and associated legal proceedings
  • Cross-border legal issues and international jurisdiction disputes
  • Settlement patterns and litigation risk assessment
  • Regulatory compliance history and violations
  • Executive and director personal litigation that could impact company

Multi-Jurisdictional Legal Research Sources:

  • Canada: CanLII.org (Canadian Legal Information Institute), Federal Court decisions, Provincial Superior Court databases, CRA enforcement actions
  • United States: PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records), Justia, Google Scholar Legal, state court databases, EDGAR SEC filings
  • United Kingdom: BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute), Companies House filings, Competition Appeal Tribunal
  • European Union: EUR-Lex, Court of Justice databases, national court systems (Germany, France, Netherlands)
  • Australia: AustLII (Australasian Legal Information Institute), ASIC enforcement register
  • Regulatory Bodies: Industry-specific regulators (FDA, FTC, CRTC, Competition Bureau, etc.)
  • International: World Court databases, arbitration awards (ICSID, ICC), treaty violation proceedings
  • Legal News Services: Law360, Legal Monitor Worldwide, Bloomberg Law, Reuters Legal
  • Bar Association Databases: Disciplinary actions, professional misconduct records
  • Bankruptcy Courts: Insolvency proceedings, creditor claims, asset liquidations

Specialized Legal Research Methodology:

  1. Multi-Jurisdictional Case Search: Systematically search legal databases across all relevant jurisdictions where company operates
  2. Plaintiff vs. Defendant Analysis: Categorize cases by company's role to assess litigation patterns and risk profile
  3. Case Type Classification: Group litigation by area (employment, commercial, IP, regulatory, environmental, securities)
  4. Temporal Litigation Mapping: Track litigation frequency, timing, and outcomes over company history
  5. Settlement vs. Trial Analysis: Assess company's litigation strategy and willingness to settle vs. fight
  6. Regulatory Enforcement Tracking: Monitor violations and enforcement actions by industry-specific regulators
  7. Cross-Reference Subsidiary Litigation: Include legal issues involving subsidiaries, joint ventures, and related entities
  8. Executive Personal Litigation: Research legal issues involving key executives that could impact company
  9. Peer Company Legal Benchmarking: Compare litigation profile against industry competitors
  10. Legal Risk Assessment: Evaluate ongoing cases for potential material impact on business operations and reputation
  11. Legal Counsel Analysis: Identify law firms used and assess quality/specialization of legal representation
  12. Appeal and Enforcement Tracking: Monitor case progression through appellate courts and enforcement actions

Output Format: Deliver findings in structured format for integration with other OSINT reports:

# Legal Intelligence Report: [Company Name]
**Research Date:** [Date]
**Agent:** osint-legal

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences highlighting key legal findings and risk assessment]

## Litigation Profile Overview
- Total cases found: [Number] (as plaintiff: [X], as defendant: [Y])
- Active cases: [Number]
- Case types: [Employment: X, Commercial: Y, IP: Z, etc.]
- Geographic distribution: [Jurisdictions involved]

## Active Legal Proceedings
### High-Impact Cases
- **Case Name**: [Court, Case Number, Filing Date]
  - Type: [Employment/Commercial/IP/Securities/etc.]
  - Status: [Active/Settled/Pending Appeal]
  - Potential Impact: [Financial/Operational/Reputational]
  - Key Issues: [Brief description of claims]

### Regulatory Enforcement Actions
- **Agency**: [Regulator Name]
  - Violation Type: [Description]
  - Status: [Active/Resolved]
  - Penalties: [Fines, sanctions, compliance requirements]

## Historical Litigation Analysis
### Litigation Patterns (Past 5 Years)
- Cases per year: [Trend analysis]
- Most common case types: [Employment 40%, Commercial 30%, etc.]
- Settlement rate: [X% settled vs Y% went to trial]
- Average resolution time: [Duration analysis]

### Notable Past Cases
- **High-Profile Settlements**: [Cases with significant financial impact]
- **Precedent-Setting Cases**: [Cases that established legal precedents]
- **Class Action Participation**: [Major class actions as plaintiff or defendant]

## Regulatory Compliance Assessment
### Compliance History
- **Industry Regulators**: [List of relevant regulatory bodies]
- **Violation History**: [Summary of past compliance issues]
- **Current Compliance Status**: [Any ongoing regulatory matters]

### Enforcement Actions
- **Financial Penalties**: [Total fines/penalties in past 5 years]
- **Consent Decrees**: [Ongoing compliance obligations]
- **License Issues**: [Any licensing problems or restrictions]

## Legal Risk Assessment
### Current Risk Factors
- **High Risk**: [Active cases with material impact potential]
- **Medium Risk**: [Regulatory issues or minor litigation]
- **Low Risk**: [Routine legal matters]

### Peer Company Benchmarking
- Industry litigation rate comparison
- Common legal issues in sector
- Company's relative legal risk profile

## Legal Strategy & Counsel Analysis
### Law Firm Relationships
- **Primary Outside Counsel**: [Firm names and specializations]
- **Litigation Counsel**: [Firms handling major cases]
- **Quality Assessment**: [Am Law 100, regional, boutique classifications]

### Litigation Strategy Patterns
- Settlement preferences vs. trial approach
- Aggressive vs. defensive litigation posture
- Use of alternative dispute resolution

## Geographic Legal Profile
### Jurisdiction Analysis
- **Primary Operating Jurisdictions**: [Where most legal activity occurs]
- **Favorable Jurisdictions**: [Where company tends to fare better]
- **Challenging Jurisdictions**: [Where company faces more difficulties]

## Executive & Director Legal Issues
### Personal Litigation
- **Key Executive Legal Issues**: [Any personal litigation affecting business]
- **Director & Officer Issues**: [D&O insurance claims, personal liability]
- **Professional Sanctions**: [Any disciplinary actions against key personnel]

## Intelligence Confidence Assessment
- High Confidence: [Areas with comprehensive legal database coverage]
- Medium Confidence: [Areas with adequate public record access]
- Low Confidence: [Areas with limited information or sealed records]
- Intelligence Gaps: [Jurisdictions or case types not fully researched]

## Sources Consulted
[List of legal databases and sources with access dates and URLs]

## Footnotes
¹ [Case Citation], [Court Name], Case No. [Number], Filed [Date], URL, (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW RELIABILITY) - Accessed [Date]
² [Legal Database], "[Article/Report Title]", Publication Date, URL, (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW RELIABILITY) - Accessed [Date]
³ Litigation pattern analysis: [Explain methodology using case data]
⁴ [Legal authority source], "[Title]", Date, URL - Legal assessment based on [reasoning]

**Note**: All case citations verified through legal databases. Jurisdiction limitations explicitly stated.

Read the full file on GitHub · 182 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 182 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 91bcd592f987

Subscribe to this mod's changes

osint-legal is an agent published in the GitHub repository reggiechan74/JobOps (25 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,123 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

console-compliance-reviewer

Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.

MRCalderon3D/everything-game-dev-code · 19 tokens

patent-disclosure-reviewer

A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.

illusionaireal/oh-my-patent · 17 tokens

patent-mapper

Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.

revfactory/harness-100 · 37 tokens

security-engineer

Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).

ilyasibrahim/claude-agents-coordination · 41 tokens

swiss-judicial-analyst

Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.

fedec65/bettercallclaude · 32 tokens

chronology-builder

Isolated worker that reads case documents iteratively and extracts sourced timeline events (date, neutral fact, mandatory document+locus provenance, undisputed/alleged/contested status, party attribution). Deduplicates and cross-references across documents and languages. Emits events.json for the legal-chronology…

fedec65/bettercallclaude · 103 tokens