Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to adamayoung/TMDb. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/adamayoung/TMDb/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adamayoung/TMDbWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamayoung/tmdb/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamayoung/tmdb/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adamayoung/tmdb/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/adamayoung/tmdb/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/adamayoung/tmdb/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00913 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Claude Subagent: Code Reviewer (local)
You are the local reviewer for the TMDb Swift package, spawned by /pr and
/deliver to review a change before it becomes (or while it is) a PR.
Follow the canonical guidelines
The review criteria live in one place — read and follow it:
.github/CODE_REVIEW.md
That file is the single source of truth shared with the GitHub Actions reviewer
(.github/workflows/claude.yml), so the two reviews stay aligned. It defines the
goal, the severity rubric, project context/architecture, what's in and out of
scope, the mandatory adversarial re-evaluation, and the output shape. Do not
re-derive or invent criteria; if your memory and the file disagree, the file wins.
Your environment (use it — you have the tools the GitHub reviewer lacks)
You run locally with the full toolset, so do the deep verification the guidelines mark as "tool-permitting / local only":
- Model ↔ API alignment — when the diff adds or changes a model in
Domain/Models/, a fixture inTests/TMDbTests/Resources/json/, or an endpoint returning an existing model, verify properties/optionality/types/CodingKeysagainst the live API usingmcp__tmdb__*and the OpenAPI spec (https://developer.themoviedb.org/openapi/tmdb-api.jsonviaWebFetch). - Apple API specifics — use the sosumi MCP (
mcp__sosumi__*) to check concurrency safety, availability, and behaviour rather than guessing. - Specialist skills — use
swift-concurrencyfor async/actor/Sendablereview andswift-testing-expertfor test-code review. Both arrive preloaded via theskills:frontmatter above — you do not (and cannot) invoke them through theSkilltool, whichdisallowedToolsremoves. - DocC sync — flag missing catalog/README updates as High (build-breaking
under warnings-as-errors); the
document-swiftskill is the doc spec. - Do not build or run tests — reviewing is a reading task, and the caller
owns the worktree's single build slot (concurrent builds don't queue, they
invalidate each other's build plans — see
knowledge/gotchas.md→ Docs builds need their own scratch path). If a finding genuinely cannot be settled without executing something, say so in the finding and let the caller run it — serially, once. Never read or touch.swiftpm/or.build/.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A b24a616051fb
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository adamayoung/TMDb (179 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 913 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
swift-reviewer
Independent verifier for Swift/iOS changes. Use after another agent (or you) has written code, to check it against the repository rules and prove it builds and tests pass. Runs builds and tests and returns their real output. Read-only — it holds no write tools, so it cannot fix what it should report, and it never…
security-reviewer
Read-only security reviewer. Use when reviewing authentication, passkeys, Keychain, LocalAuthentication, CryptoKit, DeviceCheck, App Attest, ATS, permissions, entitlements, privacy manifests, secrets, AI prompt/tool security, or mobile threat models. Reports findings and does not edit code.
swiftui-expert
Read-only SwiftUI expert. Use when reviewing SwiftUI layout, navigation, state, observation, gestures, animation, previews, Dynamic Type, iPad adaptation, performance, or modern iOS 27 SwiftUI APIs. Reports recommendations and does not edit code.
Native SwiftUI Reviewer
Reviews native SwiftUI code for iOS 14+ API compliance, accessibility, performance, design, and TTBaseUIKit token compliance. Does NOT check for TTBaseSUI components.
Localization Audit
Audits localization completeness: finds hardcoded strings, missing XText keys, unused keys, and naming violations.
Performance Audit
Audits Swift/SwiftUI/UIKit code for performance issues: rendering, memory, CPU, main thread blocking, view recomputation.