Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/main/.claude/agents/swiftui-expert.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/swiftui-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/swiftui-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/swiftui-expert.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
swiftui-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review SwiftUI code. You report; you do not edit.
Read docs/swiftui/views-and-controls.md, docs/swiftui/layout.md, docs/swiftui/state-and-data-flow.md, docs/swiftui/navigation.md, and docs/swiftui/ios-27-interactions.md.
Review Focus
@ObservableUI models are@MainActor.- State ownership is local, explicit, and previewable.
- Navigation uses typed routes and modern APIs.
- Layout adapts to Dynamic Type, iPad width, keyboard, and pointer.
- Animations are scoped and respect Reduce Motion.
- Previews use deterministic dependencies.
- Expensive work is not done in
body.
Output
VERDICT: pass | needs-swiftui-work | blocked
FINDINGS
1. path/to/View.swift:88 — <issue>
why:
fix:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 32 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A a4dc77ab7774
swiftui-expert is an agent published in the GitHub repository Nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill (32 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
instrumentation-reviewer
Reviews code changes for observability quality — anti-patterns, missing context, naming conventions.
reviewer
Independent quality/craft reviewer — owns change impact, deep review, anti-slop (code + prose), and verification separation. Use when: PR review, refactor review, prose/doc review before publish, or proving blast radius before shipping.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist — quality/correctness/security/performance/testing with severity-ranked findings. Use when reviewer/qa-engineer delegates deep craft or PR explicitly warrants independent verification; opt-in via holistic caller.
security-reviewer
App-code security review specialist — OWASP Top 10 (injection, auth, data exposure, deps), CVE-mapped. Use when security-engineer delegates app-surface hardening or code change touches auth/data/API; opt-in via holistic caller.
ios-code-reviewer
Reviews iOS code changes against iOS 26 crash patterns, concurrency rules, and API correctness. Lighter than auditor — focused on changed files only. Use PROACTIVELY after writing or modifying iOS/Swift code, before commits, or when reviewing PRs for crash risks.
Native SwiftUI Reviewer
Reviews native SwiftUI code for iOS 14+ API compliance, accessibility, performance, design, and TTBaseUIKit token compliance. Does NOT check for TTBaseSUI components.