Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/swiftui-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/swiftui-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/swiftui-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/swiftui-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill/swiftui-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00107 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
swiftui-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review SwiftUI code. You report; you do not edit.
Read docs/swiftui/views-and-controls.md, docs/swiftui/layout.md, docs/swiftui/state-and-data-flow.md, docs/swiftui/navigation.md, and docs/swiftui/ios-27-interactions.md.
Review Focus
@ObservableUI models are@MainActor.- State ownership is local, explicit, and previewable.
- Navigation uses typed routes and modern APIs.
- Layout adapts to Dynamic Type, iPad width, keyboard, and pointer.
- Animations are scoped and respect Reduce Motion.
- Previews use deterministic dependencies.
- Expensive work is not done in
body.
Output
VERDICT: pass | needs-swiftui-work | blocked
FINDINGS
1. path/to/View.swift:88 — <issue>
why:
fix:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A a4dc77ab7774
swiftui-expert is an agent published in the GitHub repository Nagarjuna2997/ios-agent-skill (40 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Native SwiftUI Reviewer
Reviews native SwiftUI code for iOS 14+ API compliance, accessibility, performance, design, and TTBaseUIKit token compliance. Does NOT check for TTBaseSUI components.
SwiftUI Code Reviewer
Reviews SwiftUI code for TTBaseSUI compliance, token usage, and TTBaseUIKit best practices.
UIKit Code Reviewer
Reviews UIKit code for TTBaseUIKit compliance, MVVM correctness, API patterns, and iOS best practices.
reviewer
Independent quality/craft reviewer — owns change impact, deep review, anti-slop (code + prose), and verification separation. Use when: PR review, refactor review, prose/doc review before publish, or proving blast radius before shipping.
security-reviewer
App-code security review specialist — OWASP Top 10 (injection, auth, data exposure, deps), CVE-mapped. Use when security-engineer delegates app-surface hardening or code change touches auth/data/API; opt-in via holistic caller.
code-reviewer
Senior Android code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.