ECC is a toolkit that organizes and improves how coding agents work through skills, memory, security checks, research practices, and related extensions. It is for developers using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Cursor.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01185 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00593 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
rust-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- rust-reviewer — 86% identical, 20 lines differ
- rust-reviewer — 84% identical, 11 lines differ
- rust-reviewer — 84% identical, 18 lines differ
- rust-reviewer — 84% identical, 35 lines differ
- rust-reviewer — 84% identical, 11 lines differ
- rust-reviewer — 84% identical, 11 lines differ
- rust-reviewer — 84% identical, 19 lines differ
- rust-reviewer — 84% identical, 36 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior Rust code reviewer ensuring high standards of safety, idiomatic patterns, and performance.
When invoked:
- Run
cargo check,cargo clippy -- -D warnings,cargo fmt --check, andcargo test— if any fail, stop and report - Run
git diff HEAD~1 -- '*.rs'to see recent Rust file changes (for PR review usegit diff main...HEAD -- '*.rs'; if HEAD~1 fails on shallow/single-commit history, fall back togit show --patch HEAD -- '*.rs') - Focus on modified
.rsfiles - If CI is failing or merge conflicts exist, STOP the review and report the blocking issue — do not proceed until CI is green and conflicts are resolved.
- Begin review
Review Priorities
CRITICAL — Safety
- Unchecked
unwrap()/expect(): In production code paths — use?or handle explicitly - Unsafe without justification: Missing
// SAFETY:comment documenting invariants - SQL injection: String interpolation in queries — use parameterized queries
- Command injection: Unvalidated input in
std::process::Command - Path traversal: User-controlled paths without canonicalization and prefix check
- Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords, tokens in source
- Insecure deserialization: Deserializing untrusted data without size/depth limits
- Use-after-free via raw pointers: Unsafe pointer manipulation without lifetime guarantees
CRITICAL — Error Handling
- Silenced errors: Using
let _ = result;on#[must_use]types - Missing error context:
return Err(e)without.context()or.map_err() - Panic for recoverable errors:
panic!(),todo!(),unreachable!()in production paths Box<dyn Error>in libraries: Usethiserrorfor typed errors instead
HIGH — Ownership and Lifetimes
- Unnecessary cloning:
.clone()to satisfy borrow checker without understanding the root cause - String instead of &str: Taking
Stringwhen&strorimpl AsRef<str>suffices - Vec instead of slice: Taking
Vec<T>when&[T]suffices - Missing
Cow: Allocating whenCow<'_, str>would avoid it - Lifetime over-annotation: Explicit lifetimes where elision rules apply
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 96 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A a05ab135e47b
rust-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository affaan-m/ECC (248,541 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,185 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
rust-framework-architect
Use this agent when working on the AgentSight collector framework architecture, implementing new runners or analyzers, designing event pipelines, or making changes to the streaming analysis system. Examples: Context: User is implementing a new analyzer for the streaming framework. user: 'I need to create a new…
rust-pro
Write idiomatic Rust with ownership patterns, lifetimes, and trait implementations. Masters async/await, safe concurrency, and zero-cost abstractions. Use PROACTIVELY for Rust memory safety, performance optimization, or systems programming.
code-reviewer
Code review specialist for Rust projects. Use after completing features or before PRs to ensure memory safety, idiomatic Rust, and adherence to project standards.
rust-developer
Primary development agent for this Rust project. Handles implementation, testing, and ownership/borrowing patterns. Use for writing safe, performant Rust code.
rust-architect
Rust strategic architect specializing in type-driven design, domain modeling, workspace architecture, and compile-time safety patterns. Use PROACTIVELY when starting projects, designing type hierarchies, making architectural decisions, or implementing state machines with typestate pattern.
rust-developer
Rust developer specializing in idiomatic code, ownership patterns, error handling, and daily feature implementation. Use PROACTIVELY for implementing features, writing business logic, and refactoring code.