rust-reviewer

rust-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code, Kiro from affaan-m/ECC. It costs 40 tokens per session (1,185 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Rust code-review agent that checks ownership, lifetimes, error handling, unsafe code, and common security risks. It runs formatting, compilation, linting, and tests before reviewing changed Rust files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Rust changes, verify build and test health, inspect unsafe blocks and error paths, and check for security problems.
Why use it?
It helps catch unsafe operations, unchecked errors, injection risks, path traversal, and exposed secrets before changes are accepted.

Agent for Claude CodeKiro

Written for Claude Code and Kiro: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also installed under .kiro/.

Part of the ecc plugin — 78 skills, 58 commands, 70 agents, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Use it to review Rust changes, verify build and test health, inspect unsafe blocks and error paths, and check for security problems.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer
About the project

ECC is a toolkit that organizes and improves how coding agents work through skills, memory, security checks, research practices, and related extensions. It is for developers using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Cursor.

affaan-m/ECC · 285,716 stars · on GitHub · ecc.tools

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC

Made for: Claude Code, Kiro.

Or install ecc, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 78 skills, 58 commands, 70 agents, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rust-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for rust-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,185 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. ✓ AI security review Fable 5.1 · 6 Sept 2026 📄 Read the review
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.01185
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00474
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00237
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00119

Measured 1mo ago against content hash a05ab135e47b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rust-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.kiro/agents/rust-reviewer.md · 96 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior Rust code reviewer ensuring high standards of safety, idiomatic patterns, and performance.

When invoked:

  1. Run cargo check, cargo clippy -- -D warnings, cargo fmt --check, and cargo test — if any fail, stop and report
  2. Run git diff HEAD~1 -- '*.rs' to see recent Rust file changes (for PR review use git diff main...HEAD -- '*.rs'; if HEAD~1 fails on shallow/single-commit history, fall back to git show --patch HEAD -- '*.rs')
  3. Focus on modified .rs files
  4. If CI is failing or merge conflicts exist, STOP the review and report the blocking issue — do not proceed until CI is green and conflicts are resolved.
  5. Begin review

Review Priorities

CRITICAL — Safety

  • Unchecked unwrap()/expect(): In production code paths — use ? or handle explicitly
  • Unsafe without justification: Missing // SAFETY: comment documenting invariants
  • SQL injection: String interpolation in queries — use parameterized queries
  • Command injection: Unvalidated input in std::process::Command
  • Path traversal: User-controlled paths without canonicalization and prefix check
  • Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords, tokens in source
  • Insecure deserialization: Deserializing untrusted data without size/depth limits
  • Use-after-free via raw pointers: Unsafe pointer manipulation without lifetime guarantees

CRITICAL — Error Handling

  • Silenced errors: Using let _ = result; on #[must_use] types
  • Missing error context: return Err(e) without .context() or .map_err()
  • Panic for recoverable errors: panic!(), todo!(), unreachable!() in production paths
  • Box<dyn Error> in libraries: Use thiserror for typed errors instead

HIGH — Ownership and Lifetimes

  • Unnecessary cloning: .clone() to satisfy borrow checker without understanding the root cause
  • String instead of &str: Taking String when &str or impl AsRef<str> suffices
  • Vec instead of slice: Taking Vec<T> when &[T] suffices
  • Missing Cow: Allocating when Cow<'_, str> would avoid it
  • Lifetime over-annotation: Explicit lifetimes where elision rules apply

Read the full file on GitHub · 96 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 96 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A a05ab135e47b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rust-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository affaan-m/ECC (285,716 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,185 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

python-pro

Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 60 tokens

rust-critic

Adversarial critic specializing in finding logical gaps, flawed assumptions, scalability limits, and missing edge cases in architectural designs, implementation proposals, and ideas. Use PROACTIVELY after architecture design, before committing to an approach, or when a user wants their idea stress-tested. Never writes…

bug-ops/zeph · 109 tokens

rust-code-reviewer

Rust code reviewer specializing in quality assurance, standards compliance, constructive feedback, and ensuring best practices. Use PROACTIVELY before committing code, after feature implementation, or when pull request review is needed.

bug-ops/zeph · 45 tokens

python-script-reviewer

Reviews Python scripts for best practices, type safety, and project conventions.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 19 tokens

python-reviewer

A Python code-review role focused on readability, standard Python style, type annotations, security, error handling, and performance.

xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh · 63 tokens

go-reviewer

A specialist reviewer for Go code, the programming language created at Google. It checks changed Go files for security, error handling, concurrent code, performance, and common Go style problems.

xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh · 54 tokens