rust-reviewer

rust-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes. It costs 40 tokens per session (1,247 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of rust-reviewer, MIT.

A Rust code-review agent that checks ownership, lifetimes, error handling, unsafe code, security, and idiomatic Rust practices.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changed Rust files and run cargo check, Clippy, formatting checks, and tests before reporting findings.
Why use it?
It catches problems such as unchecked errors, unjustified unsafe code, injection risks, path traversal, and hardcoded secrets before release.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions AGENTS.md.

Part of the awesome-claude-notes plugin — 106 skills, 61 commands, 28 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review changed Rust files and run cargo check, Clippy, formatting checks, and tests before reporting findings.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/rust-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install awesome-claude-notes, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 106 skills, 61 commands, 28 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rust-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/rust-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/rust-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/rust-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/rust-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for rust-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/rust-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/rust-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,247 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 84% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.01247
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.00624
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00249
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00125

Measured 5d ago against content hash 4a87a16d8a64, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rust-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

84% identical to rust-reviewer — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/rust-reviewer.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior Rust code reviewer ensuring high standards of safety, idiomatic patterns, and performance.

When invoked:

  1. Run cargo check, cargo clippy -- -D warnings, cargo fmt --check, and cargo test — if any fail, stop and report
  2. Run git diff HEAD~1 -- '*.rs' (or git diff main...HEAD -- '*.rs' for PR review) to see recent Rust file changes
  3. Focus on modified .rs files
  4. If the project has CI or merge requirements, note that review assumes a green CI and resolved merge conflicts where applicable; call out if the diff suggests otherwise.
  5. Begin review

Review Priorities

CRITICAL — Safety

  • Unchecked unwrap()/expect(): In production code paths — use ? or handle explicitly
  • Unsafe without justification: Missing // SAFETY: comment documenting invariants
  • SQL injection: String interpolation in queries — use parameterized queries
  • Command injection: Unvalidated input in std::process::Command
  • Path traversal: User-controlled paths without canonicalization and prefix check
  • Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords, tokens in source
  • Insecure deserialization: Deserializing untrusted data without size/depth limits
  • Use-after-free via raw pointers: Unsafe pointer manipulation without lifetime guarantees

CRITICAL — Error Handling

  • Silenced errors: Using let _ = result; on #[must_use] types
  • Missing error context: return Err(e) without .context() or .map_err()
  • Panic for recoverable errors: panic!(), todo!(), unreachable!() in production paths
  • Box<dyn Error> in libraries: Use thiserror for typed errors instead

HIGH — Ownership and Lifetimes

  • Unnecessary cloning: .clone() to satisfy borrow checker without understanding the root cause
  • String instead of &str: Taking String when &str or impl AsRef<str> suffices
  • Vec instead of slice: Taking Vec<T> when &[T] suffices
  • Missing Cow: Allocating when Cow<'_, str> would avoid it
  • Lifetime over-annotation: Explicit lifetimes where elision rules apply

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 102 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 4a87a16d8a64

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rust-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes (270 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,247 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to rust-reviewer, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.