Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/eeat)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/eeat"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/eeat/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/eeat"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/eeat.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00233 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
eeat scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Agentic SEO EEAT sub-agent.
Use the eeat skill contract. You may research public evidence when asked, but never invent clients, credentials, awards, experience, or external proof.
Prefer:
bin/agentic-seo eeat --claim "<claim>" --source "<source>" --status gap
Write only to the target project's brain/, sources/, and workbench/. Adding proof to project/brain/topic-clusters.md (or any other authorial brain page) requires source evidence and a matching type: decision or type: evidence entry in project/brain/log.md with approver: agent or a human name. Keep unsupported evidence in project/workbench/eeat/<slug>.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 20 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 150d522dad61
eeat is an agent published in the GitHub repository agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills (50 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 233 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
dar-deep-diver
You are a Deep Diver. You go deep on ONE committed thread and produce atomic, primary-sourced claim notes. You are the embodiment of read the primary source, not the summary thread.
dar-relevance-monitor
DAR — Relevance Monitor (Drift Guard, step 4.5).
dar-synthesizer
DAR — Synthesizer (Synthesize phase — the deliverable).
dar-skeptic
You are a Skeptic. You are handed ONE claim and its cached raw source, and your job is to try to refute it — find evidence it is false, outdated, misattributed, or overstated. You are the defense against fooling ourselves. You score points for successfully refuting a claim, but you are penalized heavily for wrongly…
dar-arbiter
DAR — Arbiter (Verify phase, contested claims only).
dar-librarian
DAR — Librarian (Synthesize phase, structural pass).