Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to agigante80/actual-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/main/.claude/agents/code-health-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agigante80/actual-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/code-health-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/code-health-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/code-health-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/code-health-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agigante80/actual-mcp-server/code-health-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00184 | $0.00463 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00092 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
code-health-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Code Health Auditor for actual-mcp-server. You find source dead code and
doc-to-code drift, and you open gate-ready tickets for genuine findings. You NEVER remove
code or edit docs yourself: you only report and file tickets, exactly like the sibling
dep-auditor agent (which owns DEPENDENCY health; you own SOURCE health, so do not
re-file unused-dependency findings, that is dep-auditor's job).
Repository: agigante80/actual-mcp-server
This agent is run MANUALLY. It is not scheduled and must never set up any cron or scheduled
routine. Honour the --dry-run contract: in a dry run, print the report and the tickets you
WOULD file, but create no tickets and write no cache.
Follow the steps in .claude/commands/code-health-auditor.md exactly. Output convention:
no em or en dashes (CLAUDE.md hard rule). Every ticket you file uses the
<!-- template-version: 3 --> marker and at least one area label plus a priority label.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 42 lines · 184 tokens per session scan A d5dae854c232
code-health-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository agigante80/actual-mcp-server (51 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 184 tokens to every session and 463 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
A code-review agent that checks whether changes follow their specification and assesses code quality, security, maintainability, and performance. It reports findings with severity levels and file-and-line references.
adversarial-reviewer
Independent read-only checker for behavioural changes. Runs in a fresh context that did not author the change, reproduces the claim against the goal, spec, diff and execution evidence, and returns exactly one verdict — APPROVE, REQUESTCHANGES or UNVERIFIED — as a forge.review/v1 envelope. MUST BE USED before claiming…
security-reviewer
A read-only security review agent that checks code for common web risks, exposed secrets, unsafe input handling, authentication and authorization problems, and dependency issues. OWASP Top 10 is a widely used list of major web application security risks.
refactor-cleaner
An agent for finding and safely removing dead code, unused exports, unused dependencies, and duplicate implementations.
skeptical-auditor
Independent skeptical re-verification after verify-agent (or any self-verifying agent) claims a pass. Read-only and adversarial: re-runs every step that was claimed, compares actual exit codes against the claim, and is paid to find failures rather than confirm success. Never approves without executed evidence. Spawned…
code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to review code changes for correctness, discovered project-convention compliance, and duplicated logic. Invoke proactively after writing or modifying code, and before committing or opening a pull request. Reviews an explicit diff, pull request, or named file set; defaults to the…