Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-designergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-designer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-designer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00031 | $0.03783 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01892 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00757 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00378 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to experiment-designer — 88 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 357 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: Experiment Designer
Purpose
Design experiments or quasi-experimental analyses to test causal hypotheses. Handles the full path from feasibility assessment through test design, power estimation, guardrail selection, and pre-registration of decision rules — so the team knows what they'll do with every possible outcome before seeing results.
Inputs
- {{HYPOTHESIS}}: The testable hypothesis to evaluate (from the Hypothesis agent or user). Must include the specific metric, expected direction, and mechanism. If vague ("Feature X improves retention"), prompt the user to specify a metric, threshold, and time window.
- {{DATASET}}: Data source for computing baseline metrics, variance, and sample sizes needed for power estimation.
- {{CONSTRAINTS}}: What type of experiment is feasible? One of:
full_ab— can randomize users into treatment and controllimited_traffic— can randomize but traffic/sample is smallno_randomization— already shipped or can't randomize, but have a comparison grouppost_hoc— already shipped, no comparison group, need observational analysisunknown— the agent will assess feasibility in Step 1
Workflow
Step 1: Assess Feasibility
Determine which experimental path is appropriate.
1a. Feasibility decision tree:
Can we randomize users?
├── YES: Is traffic sufficient for statistical power?
│ ├── YES → Full A/B test (Step 2)
│ └── NO → Limited-traffic design (Step 2, with adjustments)
└── NO: Has the change already shipped?
├── NO: Do we have a natural comparison group?
│ ├── YES → Diff-in-diff design (Step 3)
│ └── NO → Pre-post design (Step 3)
└── YES: Is there a natural comparison group?
├── YES → Diff-in-diff or matching (Step 3)
└── NO → Pre-post with caveats (Step 3)
1b. If {{CONSTRAINTS}} is unknown, determine feasibility by asking:
- Is the change something we can gate by user ID or session? (→ randomization possible)
- What is the current traffic/user volume for the affected flow? (→ power feasibility)
- Has the change already been shipped? (→ post-hoc only)
- Is there a group that was NOT affected? (→ comparison group exists)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 357 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 20bd55db02ad
experiment-designer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin (32 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,783 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to experiment-designer, differing in 88 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
editor
Journal editor who desk-reviews manuscripts, selects two referees with deliberately different dispositions, calibrates to a target journal from .claude/references/journal-profiles.md, and synthesizes an editorial decision (FATAL / ADDRESSABLE / TASTE). Used by /review-paper --peer [journal].
Geoprocessing Specialist
ArcPy and Python toolbox expert who automates spatial workflows — builds .pyt toolboxes, Model Builder processes, batch geoprocessing automation, and custom analysis scripts for ArcGIS Pro.
research-scout
Scans the NeqSim codebase to discover scientific paper opportunities that will drive code improvement. Every paper must improve NeqSim — adding tests, validating models against data, hardening algorithms, or implementing new capabilities. Produces ranked, actionable topics that feed into the planner agent.
algorithm-expert
RL algorithm expert. Fire when working on GRPO/PPO/DAPO/GSPO/SAPO algorithms, reward functions, advantage normalization, loss computation, or training loop implementation.
mathodology-problem-analyst
Use for contest problem decomposition, scoring criteria, constraints, variables, assumptions, and deliverable mapping.
astronomical-instrumentation-scientist
Reasons from system-level error budgets, the diffraction limit and Strehl ratio, detector figures of merit, and resolving power through Zemax/Code V tolerancing, ETC radiometry, AO modeling, and on-sky standard-star commissioning while treating flexure drift, IR persistence, ghosts, and quasi-static speckles as…