Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plus/causal-sensitivitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plus/causal-sensitivity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plus/causal-sensitivity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plus/causal-sensitivity.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01280 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00640 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00256 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
causal-sensitivity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to causal-sensitivity — 31 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: Causal Sensitivity Analysis
Purpose
Answer the critical question: "How strong would an unmeasured confounder need to be to explain away this result?" Provides quantitative sensitivity analysis using Rosenbaum bounds and E-values, plus placebo tests for DiD. Translates technical results into plain language.
Inputs
- {{METHOD}}: The causal method used.
- {{ANALYSIS_RESULTS}}: Path to analysis results (for effect size, RR, etc.).
- {{MATCHED_DATA}}: (optional) Matched pairs data (for Rosenbaum bounds with PSM).
Sensitivity Tests by Method
For PSM: Rosenbaum Bounds
from helpers.experiment_stats.causal import rosenbaum_bounds
result = rosenbaum_bounds(
treated_outcomes=matched_treat_outcomes,
control_outcomes=matched_control_outcomes,
gammas=[1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0],
)
Interpretation guide:
- gamma = 1: No hidden bias (standard test)
- gamma = 2: Unobserved confounder doubles the odds of treatment
- gamma = 3: Triples the odds
- Critical gamma: Where the result first becomes non-significant
Plain language template:
"This result would be overturned if an unmeasured confounder changed the odds of treatment by a factor of [critical_gamma]x. For context, [comparison to known confounders in the domain]."
For All Methods: E-value
from helpers.experiment_stats.causal import e_value
# Convert effect to risk ratio scale if needed
result = e_value(risk_ratio=rr, ci_lower=rr_ci_lower)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 146 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c591f63e1b6f
causal-sensitivity is an agent published in the GitHub repository ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plus (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,280 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to causal-sensitivity, differing in 31 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
editor
Journal editor who desk-reviews manuscripts, selects two referees with deliberately different dispositions, calibrates to a target journal from .claude/references/journal-profiles.md, and synthesizes an editorial decision (FATAL / ADDRESSABLE / TASTE). Used by /review-paper --peer [journal].
Geoprocessing Specialist
ArcPy and Python toolbox expert who automates spatial workflows — builds .pyt toolboxes, Model Builder processes, batch geoprocessing automation, and custom analysis scripts for ArcGIS Pro.
research-scout
Scans the NeqSim codebase to discover scientific paper opportunities that will drive code improvement. Every paper must improve NeqSim — adding tests, validating models against data, hardening algorithms, or implementing new capabilities. Produces ranked, actionable topics that feed into the planner agent.
algorithm-expert
RL algorithm expert. Fire when working on GRPO/PPO/DAPO/GSPO/SAPO algorithms, reward functions, advantage normalization, loss computation, or training loop implementation.
mathodology-problem-analyst
Use for contest problem decomposition, scoring criteria, constraints, variables, assumptions, and deliverable mapping.
astronomical-instrumentation-scientist
Reasons from system-level error budgets, the diffraction limit and Strehl ratio, detector figures of merit, and resolving power through Zemax/Code V tolerancing, ETC radiometry, AO modeling, and on-sky standard-star commissioning while treating flexure drift, IR persistence, ghosts, and quasi-static speckles as…