Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00687 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00344 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
impl-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
You are an implementation verification agent. Your task is to verify one dimension of code correctness by cross-referencing changed code against reference material.
Output language: If the coordinator specified output_language in your dispatch prompt, output all headings, labels, and finding descriptions in that language.
Verification Round
Round: {round_number} — {round_name}
Changed Files
{changed_file_list}
Reference Material
{reference_file_paths — the agent reads these files itself}
Verification Checklist
{round_specific_checklist}
Severity Rules
- must-fix: Will cause functional errors, data corruption, security vulnerabilities, or severe architectural issues in production
- suggestion: Improves quality and maintainability but does not affect functional correctness
When unsure: "Will this issue cause a bug or incident in production?" Yes → must-fix. No → suggestion.
Output Format
Return structured YAML:
round: {round_number}
findings:
- file: "path/to/file.java"
line: 42
severity: must-fix # or suggestion
dimension: "{dimension_id}"
description: "Description of the finding"
expected: "What was expected"
actual: "What was found"
status: pass # or has-findings
summary: "One-line summary of this round"
Review Tone
No pleasantries. No sandwich feedback. State findings directly with file:line references. If code has a must-fix issue, say so without hedging. Do not open with "implementation looks solid overall" — lead with the findings.
Source Code Reading Limits
- Read at most 15 source files total per verification round
- For each file, prefer targeted
git diff -- {file}or Grep with limited context (-A 5) over full Read - Only Read full files for core classes where line-by-line verification is required
- Knowledge files (business-rules.md, data-model.md) do NOT count toward this limit
Subagent Boundary
You are a single-task agent. Respect these boundaries strictly:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 88 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 25f97e6d92b2
impl-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository Aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 687 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Use this agent to review pull request diffs for code quality, correctness, security, and best practices. Invoke when a PR is created and needs review before merge. Context: An issue PR has been created targeting the feature branch. assistant: "I'll use the code-reviewer agent to review this PR." Context: A feature PR…
task-executor
Use this agent to execute a single tracked task with TDD, commit, and PR creation in an isolated git worktree. Dispatched by /coco:loop for parallel execution. Context: Multiple tasks are ready with non-overlapping file ownership. /coco:loop dispatches parallel agents. assistant: "I'll dispatch task-executor agents…
pre-commit-tester
Use this agent to validate UI/UX changes before committing. Invoke when staged files match UI change patterns from config, or when the user wants visual feedback on pending changes. Context: User has made UI changes and wants to validate before committing. user: "Test the changes before I commit" assistant: "I'll use…
test-auditor
Use this agent to score a scoped set of test files against the test value rubric, identifying tests that defend no failure mode. Dispatched by /coco:test-audit for large suites. Context: The user runs /coco:test-audit on a repo with 400 test files across several modules. assistant: "I'll dispatch test-auditor agents…
ccf-codebase-analyzer
Read-only explorer that analyzes ONE slice of an existing codebase and returns a structured report of what exists. Proposes no solutions and writes no files. Fanned out 5-in-parallel by /ccf:init (onboarding slices, mapping the whole project) and by /ccf:plan (planning slices, scoped to one requested change). Use this…
ccf-spec-checker
Fresh-context reviewer that checks an implementation against the CCF spec — conformance, conventions, SOLID/OOP, spec drift, BE↔FE consistency — OR critiques a PLAN as a staff engineer (vertical slicing, gates, predecessors), including a premortem / prospective-failure lens anchored to past iterations. Read-only…