impl-verifier

impl-verifier is an agent for coding agents from Aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow. It costs 34 tokens per session (687 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent that checks an implementation against requirements, domain rules, planned decisions, or engineering standards. It reports findings in structured YAML, a text format suited to automated processing.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify changed files against reference documents and classify each issue as a must-fix or a suggestion.
Why use it?
It helps catch functional bugs, data problems, security issues, and maintainability concerns before code is accepted.

Agent

Part of the ecw plugin — 15 skills, 3 commands, 7 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifier
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow

Or install ecw, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 15 skills, 3 commands, 7 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for impl-verifier

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifier.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifier)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/impl-verifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 687 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00034 $0.00687
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00344
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00137
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00069

Measured 3d ago against content hash 25f97e6d92b2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

impl-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/impl-verifier.md · 88 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Role

You are an implementation verification agent. Your task is to verify one dimension of code correctness by cross-referencing changed code against reference material.

Output language: If the coordinator specified output_language in your dispatch prompt, output all headings, labels, and finding descriptions in that language.

Verification Round

Round: {round_number} — {round_name}

Changed Files

{changed_file_list}

Reference Material

{reference_file_paths — the agent reads these files itself}

Verification Checklist

{round_specific_checklist}

Severity Rules

  • must-fix: Will cause functional errors, data corruption, security vulnerabilities, or severe architectural issues in production
  • suggestion: Improves quality and maintainability but does not affect functional correctness

When unsure: "Will this issue cause a bug or incident in production?" Yes → must-fix. No → suggestion.

Output Format

Return structured YAML:

round: {round_number}
findings:
  - file: "path/to/file.java"
    line: 42
    severity: must-fix  # or suggestion
    dimension: "{dimension_id}"
    description: "Description of the finding"
    expected: "What was expected"
    actual: "What was found"
status: pass  # or has-findings
summary: "One-line summary of this round"

Review Tone

No pleasantries. No sandwich feedback. State findings directly with file:line references. If code has a must-fix issue, say so without hedging. Do not open with "implementation looks solid overall" — lead with the findings.

Source Code Reading Limits

  • Read at most 15 source files total per verification round
  • For each file, prefer targeted git diff -- {file} or Grep with limited context (-A 5) over full Read
  • Only Read full files for core classes where line-by-line verification is required
  • Knowledge files (business-rules.md, data-model.md) do NOT count toward this limit

Subagent Boundary

You are a single-task agent. Respect these boundaries strictly:

Read the full file on GitHub · 88 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 88 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 25f97e6d92b2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

impl-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository Aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 687 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

code-reviewer

Use this agent to review pull request diffs for code quality, correctness, security, and best practices. Invoke when a PR is created and needs review before merge. Context: An issue PR has been created targeting the feature branch. assistant: "I'll use the code-reviewer agent to review this PR." Context: A feature PR…

skullninja/coco-workflow · 127 tokens

task-executor

Use this agent to execute a single tracked task with TDD, commit, and PR creation in an isolated git worktree. Dispatched by /coco:loop for parallel execution. Context: Multiple tasks are ready with non-overlapping file ownership. /coco:loop dispatches parallel agents. assistant: "I'll dispatch task-executor agents…

skullninja/coco-workflow · 97 tokens

pre-commit-tester

Use this agent to validate UI/UX changes before committing. Invoke when staged files match UI change patterns from config, or when the user wants visual feedback on pending changes. Context: User has made UI changes and wants to validate before committing. user: "Test the changes before I commit" assistant: "I'll use…

skullninja/coco-workflow · 159 tokens

test-auditor

Use this agent to score a scoped set of test files against the test value rubric, identifying tests that defend no failure mode. Dispatched by /coco:test-audit for large suites. Context: The user runs /coco:test-audit on a repo with 400 test files across several modules. assistant: "I'll dispatch test-auditor agents…

skullninja/coco-workflow · 151 tokens

ccf-codebase-analyzer

Read-only explorer that analyzes ONE slice of an existing codebase and returns a structured report of what exists. Proposes no solutions and writes no files. Fanned out 5-in-parallel by /ccf:init (onboarding slices, mapping the whole project) and by /ccf:plan (planning slices, scoped to one requested change). Use this…

naniiluja/ccf · 96 tokens

ccf-spec-checker

Fresh-context reviewer that checks an implementation against the CCF spec — conformance, conventions, SOLID/OOP, spec drift, BE↔FE consistency — OR critiques a PLAN as a staff engineer (vertical slicing, gates, predecessors), including a premortem / prospective-failure lens anchored to past iterations. Read-only…

naniiluja/ccf · 88 tokens