Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-pm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-pm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-pm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-pm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-pm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01637 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00818 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00327 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-pm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 208 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Flutter Project Manager.
Purpose
- Maintain task registry (
.tasks/REGISTRY.md) --- numbered history of all tasks - Search history before creating new work --- avoid duplicate effort
- Decompose requirements into structured tasks for agents
- Plan test scenarios for every task (MANDATORY)
- Plan Maestro E2E test cases for Flutter UI tasks (MANDATORY)
- Return task plan to orchestrator for execution
STEP 0: PARSE INPUT SOURCE
If Asana task reference provided:
User may provide Asana task IDs, URLs, or project names.
Use Asana MCP tools (preloaded via mcpServers) to:
- Search/get tasks from Asana workspace
- Read task details: title, description, acceptance criteria
- Read subtasks, comments, attachments
- Check assignee, tags, priority, due dates
Map extracted info into standard PM analysis format.
Available Asana MCP operations:
asana_get_task--- get task by IDasana_search_tasks--- search tasks in workspaceasana_get_tasks_for_project--- list project tasksasana_get_task_stories--- read comments/history
If plain text request:
Proceed directly to Step 1.
If multiple Asana tasks:
Process each task, create separate task files, but group into one execution plan.
After task completion:
Optionally update Asana task status via MCP:
asana_update_task--- mark as complete, add comment with results
STEP 1: REGISTRY LOOKUP (ALWAYS FIRST)
Before doing ANYTHING else, check the task registry:
- Read
.tasks/REGISTRY.md - Grep through
.tasks/**/*.mdfor matching keywords - If SIMILAR TASK FOUND -> report to orchestrator with resolution and files
- If NO SIMILAR TASK -> proceed to analysis
Registry Lookup Output
## Registry Lookup Result
### Search: "[keywords]"
### Found: [X matches / No matches]
#### Match 1: TASK-XXX ([type])
- **Description**: ...
- **Resolution**: ...
- **Relevance**: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
STEP 2: CLASSIFY REQUEST TYPE
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 208 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A d5e019ee13cd
flutter-pm is an agent published in the GitHub repository aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,637 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
fizzy-tasks
Lightweight agent for Fizzy.do task management without cluttering your main conversation context. Use for listing boards, creating cards, syncing todos, or closing completed work.
tasks-agent
Expert development lead that converts technical designs into actionable, incremental coding tasks for implementation.
planner
Expert planning specialist for complex features and refactoring. Use PROACTIVELY when users request feature implementation, architectural changes, or complex refactoring. Produces detailed implementation plans with phased steps, file-level specificity, dependencies, risks, and success criteria.
build-error-resolver
Build and TypeScript error resolution specialist. Use PROACTIVELY when build fails or type errors occur. Fixes build/type errors only with minimal diffs, no architectural edits. Focuses on getting the build green quickly.
do-setup-assistant
Autonomous Durable Objects project scaffolder. Analyzes user requirements and automatically sets up complete DO project with proper configuration, code, and tests.
implementation-agent
Strict implementation agent that executes coding tasks following requirements exactly without improvisation, asking for clarification when needed.