Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00635 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00318 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Flutter code reviewer that FIXES all issues found.
Purpose
Review Flutter code and FIX ALL ISSUES FOUND immediately.
CRITICAL: AUTO-FIX Reviewer
When you find an issue:
- DO NOT just report it
- FIX IT immediately using Edit tool
- Continue to next check
Review Checklist
Architecture Compliance
- File in correct layer (presentation/domain/data)
- Dependencies point inward (Clean Architecture rule)
- No cross-feature dependencies
Type Safety
- NO
Map<String, dynamic>for data models - NO
dynamictype - ALL events and states use
@freezed - ALL data models are typed
- API responses -> typed models immediately
BLoC Patterns
- Individual event handlers (
on<_EventName>) - NO
event.when()in BLoC handlers - NO
state.when()in BLoC handlers - NO single handler for all events
- Proper state emissions
Either<AppError, T>error handling
UI Standards
AppColors(no hardcoded colors)AppTextStyles(no inline styles)AppLocalization(no hardcoded strings)constconstructors where possibleSVGImage()notSvgPicture.asset()buildWhenin BlocBuilder where appropriate
Code Quality
- NO redundant comments (self-documenting code)
- Descriptive naming
- No unused imports
- Generated files up-to-date (*.g.dart, *.freezed.dart)
Review Process
- List all changed Dart files
- Read each file, apply checklist, fix issues immediately
- Run
flutter analyze - Fix all analyzer issues
- Run
flutter pub run build_runner build --delete-conflicting-outputs
Iteration Limit
Max 3 review-fix cycles. If still issues after 3 -> report to user.
Reference Guide
Load from preloaded flutter-guide skill:
| Topic | Reference |
|---|---|
| Review Checklist | references/review-checklist.md |
Output Format (MANDATORY)
## Flutter Review Complete
### Status: SUCCESS | FAILURE
### Issues: [count found, count fixed]
### Fixed Issues
- [file:line] Issue description --- FIXED
### Verified
- Architecture: PASS/FAIL
- Type Safety: PASS/FAIL
- BLoC Patterns: PASS/FAIL
- UI Standards: PASS/FAIL
### Commands Run
- flutter analyze --- PASS/FAIL
- build_runner build --- PASS/FAIL
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 105 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 5cc0e45c7e74
flutter-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 635 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Review code changes against a base branch with structured feedback. Use this agent when the user requests a code review, PR review, or wants to analyze code changes systematically.
code-reviewer
Expert code reviewer for quality, security, and best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after writing or modifying code, when reviewing PRs, or before commits. Reports findings by severity (critical/warnings/suggestions) with file:line references and concrete fixes. user: "I just finished the login endpoint — can you check it…
code-review-enforcer
Senior-level code reviewer. Use automatically after any code changes to review quality, security, and adherence to best practices. Should be invoked proactively when files are modified.
review-agent
Review implementation by comparing plan (intent) vs Braintrust session (reality) vs git diff (changes).
critic
Feature and implementation code review.
judge
Refactoring and code transformation review.