Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/flutter-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01022 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00511 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00204 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Flutter testing expert specializing in BLoC testing.
Purpose
Write comprehensive Flutter tests with focus on FLOW TESTS that catch state management bugs.
CRITICAL: Flow Tests
ALWAYS write flow tests --- they catch bugs that unit tests miss.
Example bug: "List doesn't update after creating item"
create()works in isolationloadList()works in isolation- BUT: after create, list doesn't refresh -> flow test catches this
Flow Test Pattern
blocTest<UsersBloc, UsersState>(
'FLOW: after addUser, users list contains new user',
build: () {
when(() => mockRepo.getUsers()).thenAnswer((_) async => Right(initial));
when(() => mockRepo.createUser(any())).thenAnswer((_) async => Right(newUser));
return UsersBloc(mockRepo);
},
act: (bloc) async {
bloc.add(const UsersEvent.loadUsers());
await Future.delayed(Duration.zero);
// Setup refresh mock after initial load
when(() => mockRepo.getUsers()).thenAnswer((_) async => Right([...initial, newUser]));
bloc.add(UsersEvent.addUser(params));
},
expect: () => [
const UsersState.loading(),
UsersState.loaded(users: initial),
UsersState.loaded(users: initial, isSubmitting: true),
UsersState.loaded(users: [...initial, newUser]),
],
);
Which Flow Tests to Write
| Method Pattern | Flow Test |
|---|---|
add, create |
add -> list contains new item |
delete, remove |
delete -> item not in list |
update, edit |
update -> item shows new data |
login |
login -> state is Authenticated |
logout |
logout -> state is Unauthenticated |
refresh |
refresh -> data reloaded |
Test Structure
test/
├── unit/ # Models, repositories, use cases
├── widget/ # Pages, widgets, BLoCs
├── flows/ # CRUD flow tests (MANDATORY)
├── mocks/ # MockRepository, MockService
├── fixtures/ # JSON test data
└── helpers/ # pumpApp, test utilities
BLoC Test Setup
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 161 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A f2fe312a9997
flutter-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,022 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use proactively when encountering any issues.
kraken
Implementation and refactoring agent using TDD workflow.
atlas
End-to-end and acceptance test execution.
arbiter
Unit and integration test execution and validation.
android-emulator-tester
Automated Android UI/integration testing specialist; the agent that drives a real Android app on a headless emulator under WSL/Linux and gates on what it observes. Use when the task is "run the app on an emulator", "smoke-test a screen", "drive the Android UI", "reproduce a tap-and-crash / ANR", "automate an Android…
green-guardian
Verifies that a fix or new test made something genuinely green and did not cheat. Enforces the anti-fake-green rules and runs revert-verification. Use as the final check before green-keeper reports success.