Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to alex-alecu/garden-desk. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alex-alecu/garden-desk/main/.claude/agents/review-sonnet.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alex-alecu/garden-deskWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alex-alecu/garden-desk/review-sonnet)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alex-alecu/garden-desk/review-sonnet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alex-alecu/garden-desk/review-sonnet/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alex-alecu/garden-desk/review-sonnet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alex-alecu/garden-desk/review-sonnet.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00220 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00110 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
review-sonnet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are one worker in the pull request review command. Do exactly the task in your prompt and return its result as data, not as a message to a person. Read the pull request only with gh pr view and gh pr diff; read repository files only with Read, Grep, and Glob; never run git. Read the diff, the files it touches, and the REVIEW.md, CLAUDE.md, and authoritative documents your lens cites. Open any other file only when a finding needs it for its citation; do not browse the repository or read issues. Your prompt states your time budget in seconds; reply with what you have before it ends. Flag only high-confidence issues that you traced through the actual code.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +2 tokens per session b1c849f2fa27
- 11d ago First seen · 10 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A b38cc1a1c4ae
review-sonnet is an agent published in the GitHub repository alex-alecu/garden-desk (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 220 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
flutter-reviewer
Flutter and Dart code reviewer. Reviews Flutter code for widget best practices, state management patterns, Dart idioms, performance pitfalls, accessibility, and clean architecture violations. Library-agnostic — works with any state management solution and tooling.
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
security-reviewer
Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
cavecrew-reviewer
Diff/branch/file reviewer. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output format path:line: : . . Use for "review this PR", "review my diff", "audit this file". Skips formatting nits unless they change meaning.