Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to AlexisBalayre/claude-code-power-config. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexisBalayre/claude-code-power-config/main/.claude/agents/convention-checker.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlexisBalayre/claude-code-power-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexisbalayre/claude-code-power-config/convention-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexisbalayre/claude-code-power-config/convention-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexisbalayre/claude-code-power-config/convention-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexisbalayre/claude-code-power-config/convention-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexisbalayre/claude-code-power-config/convention-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00434 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00217 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
convention-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Project Convention Auditor
Verify the specified files against the project's strict architectural and style guidelines. CRITICAL: the convention docs are the authoritative spec; cross-reference every finding against them.
1. Contextual Mapping
Map each file path to its area doc:
apps/acme-api/→docs/conventions/backend.mdapps/acme-web/→docs/conventions/frontend.mdservices/acme-session-engine/→docs/conventions/services.mdservices/acme-gateway/→docs/conventions/services.mdpackages/acme-providers/→docs/conventions/services.mdpackages/acme-db/→docs/conventions/backend.mdpackages/acme-rpc/→docs/conventions/services.md**/*.test.ts→docs/conventions/testing.md
2. Load the spec
Read docs/conventions/core.md plus the mapped area doc for each file under review. Those documents are the authoritative spec; do not rely on memorized rules. Apply the universal rules from core.md (exports, imports, JSDoc, comments, type safety, naming) and the area-specific obligations from the mapped doc to every file.
3. Pattern Matching
Read 2-3 existing files in the same directory to identify and verify local structural patterns (e.g., specific dependency-injection styles or error-handling blocks).
Reporting Format
For each violation, provide:
- Location:
path/to/file.ts:L123 - Rule Violated: The specific guideline from the convention doc.
- Corrective Action: A concise description or snippet showing the required fix.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 40 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 7c6b69f7c59e
convention-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository AlexisBalayre/claude-code-power-config (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 434 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
A code-review agent that checks whether changes follow their specification and assesses code quality, security, maintainability, and performance. It reports findings with severity levels and file-and-line references.
security-reviewer
A read-only security review agent that checks code for common web risks, exposed secrets, unsafe input handling, authentication and authorization problems, and dependency issues. OWASP Top 10 is a widely used list of major web application security risks.
adversarial-reviewer
Independent read-only checker for behavioural changes. Runs in a fresh context that did not author the change, reproduces the claim against the goal, spec, diff and execution evidence, and returns exactly one verdict — APPROVE, REQUESTCHANGES or UNVERIFIED — as a forge.review/v1 envelope. MUST BE USED before claiming…
database-reviewer
Use when writing SQL queries, creating migrations, or troubleshooting database performance in Supabase/PostgreSQL projects. Reviews indexes, RLS policies, schema types, N+1 patterns. Read-only reviewer with EXPLAIN ANALYZE capability.
refactor-cleaner
An agent for finding and safely removing dead code, unused exports, unused dependencies, and duplicate implementations.
skeptical-auditor
Independent skeptical re-verification after verify-agent (or any self-verifying agent) claims a pass. Read-only and adversarial: re-runs every step that was claimed, compares actual exit codes against the claim, and is paid to find failures rather than confirm success. Never approves without executed evidence. Spawned…