Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexmmatos/essentials-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/essentials-claude-code/reinforcement-learning-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/essentials-claude-code/reinforcement-learning-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexmmatos/essentials-claude-code/reinforcement-learning-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/essentials-claude-code/reinforcement-learning-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexmmatos/essentials-claude-code/reinforcement-learning-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01478 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00739 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00296 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00148 |
Grade A, and why
reinforcement-learning-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 278 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A bbef7a246a6e
reinforcement-learning-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository alexmmatos/essentials-claude-code (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,478 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
context-delegate
Context Gatherer & External LLM Prompt Generator.
data-analyst
Produces data briefs with pipeline designs, model I/O schemas, and validation strategies for feature specifications.
the-incident-responder
Use during or after an AI-feature incident — model regression, sudden hallucination spike, eval drop, guardrail bypass, cost or latency anomaly, customer-reported wrong answer that escalated. Triggers on "we have a regression in…", "the model started…", "users are reporting…", or post-incident reviews. Complements the…
the-eval-designer
Use when the user needs to design an evaluation system for an LLM or ML feature — golden datasets, metrics, LLM-as-judge rubrics, regression suites, or production sampling strategies. Trigger when the question is "how do I measure if this is good?" or when shipping an AI feature without a clear eval in place.
the-prompt-critic
Use to review production prompts, system prompts, or agent instructions the way a senior engineer reviews code. Trigger when the user shares a prompt and asks "is this good?", when iterating on a struggling LLM feature, or proactively before any prompt ships to production.
the-translator
Use when the user needs to convert technical AI results (eval metrics, latency numbers, failure modes, model trade-offs) into business-language updates for executives, stakeholders, or investor demos. Trigger for demo prep, exec summaries, post-incident comms, or when an AI-technical result must land with a…