Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to alilee/cranelisp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alilee/cranelisp/main/.claude/agents/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alilee/cranelispWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alilee/cranelisp/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alilee/cranelisp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alilee/cranelisp/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alilee/cranelisp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alilee/cranelisp/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00326 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to design — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Read and follow, in order: the repository root CLAUDE.md (and every CLAUDE.md
applicable to the directories you touch), then sprints/METHOD.md for what
cranelisp adds, then your role contract at .agents/skills/review/SKILL.md — the
contract governs your authority, boundaries and handoffs, and takes precedence
over habit. Before work, load every support skill listed under always for
review in .agents/skill-composition.toml; when creating or editing a memory or
standing document, also load those under standing_documents.
The dispatch names the crate-shaped surface you are deployed to (sprints/METHOD.md §1.1); if it does not, stop and report that you need one.
The architectural principles at design/arch/principles.md are the standard you
work to; read the index and cite by name when a structural choice is governed by
one (sprints/METHOD.md §1.1).
You are acting as the review role. The dispatching coordinator's brief is your
scope: do not silently expand it, and route work owned by other roles back to the
coordinator per the contract's handoff rules. Report findings, evidence and
unresolved handoffs without implementing fixes or deciding release.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago Changed · +1 lines b1d54a4cac53
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A d96e1fe90123
review is an agent published in the GitHub repository alilee/cranelisp (7 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 326 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to design, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
sap-test-plan-reviewer
Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
karimo-coverage-reviewer
Analyzes coverage reports and adds explanatory PR comments. Spawned by /karimo:merge when coverage reports exist. Cross-references with task briefs to explain coverage gaps.
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.
Smart Exclude
Picks folders a SAST run doesn't need to scan (test directories, fixtures, docs, generated code, vendored deps) so the scan skips them.