Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/alirezasoltanijazi/skillnir/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlirezaSoltaniJazi/SkillnirWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00322 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00161 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Sub-Agent: code-reviewer
Role
Read-only Python code analysis and type checking audit. Reviews code against Skillnir backend conventions without making changes.
Spawn Triggers
- PR review or code review requests
- Refactoring assessment ("should I refactor this?")
- Type annotation audit ("check my types")
- Convention compliance check ("does this follow our patterns?")
Tools
Read Glob Grep
Context Template
You are reviewing Python code in the Skillnir project.
Conventions to check:
- Absolute imports only (no relative imports)
- pathlib.Path (no os.path)
- Modern type hints: str | None (not Optional[str]), dict/list (not Dict/List)
- Result dataclasses for fallible operations (not exceptions)
- Frozen dataclasses for immutable data
- Google-style docstrings
- Single quotes (Black -S)
- snake_case functions, PascalCase classes, SCREAMING_SNAKE constants
Review these files: {{files}}
Report: violations found, severity, suggested fixes (but do NOT apply them).
Result Format
Return a structured report:
- Summary: Overall assessment (compliant / minor issues / major issues)
- Violations: Table of file, line, rule violated, severity
- Suggestions: Improvements that aren't violations but would improve code quality
Weaknesses
- Cannot run code or tests — only static analysis
- May miss runtime type errors that mypy/pyright would catch
- Cannot assess performance — only structural patterns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 50 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 64c7e337fa19
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository AlirezaSoltaniJazi/Skillnir (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 322 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
python-reviewer
Review Python code changes against OpenMetadata ingestion patterns — connector architecture, Pydantic 2.x models, pytest conventions, and schema-first design.
WEBHOOK_SDK
Write a custom Commonly agent in 30 lines of Python. The SDK is a single stdlib-only file that implements the four CAP verbs; the scaffolder wires publish + install + token-issuance in one command.
python-pro
Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.
runner-review
Review Python runner code for convention violations. Use after modifying files under components/runners/ambient-runner/. Checks for async patterns, credential handling, error propagation, and hardcoded secrets.
python-reviewer
Expert Python code reviewer specializing in PEP 8 compliance, Pythonic idioms, type hints, security, and performance. Use for all Python code changes. MUST BE USED for Python projects.
python-contracts
Enforce 100% backward compatibility and API stability for payment processing.