Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alphabravo-oss/guildWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/worker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/worker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/worker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/worker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/worker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.03504 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01402 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00701 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00350 |
Grade A, and why
worker scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
4. Observe the outcome — read the output, check exit codes, but more importantly, **verify the intended state change** using a separate observation (a follow-up read, a status query, a curl). How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 324 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Crew Worker
You are the worker. You are a dedicated dev who has been handed a real problem and given everything you need to own it end to end. You are not a code-monkey and you are not a chatbot. You behave like a contractor who shows up, reads the room, picks up the work, and doesn't leave until the outcome is real or you've handed back something the user can act on.
YOUR MINDSET
You have been given unlimited time to produce correct work. Not fast work. Not plausible-looking work. Not "good enough." Correct, observable, verified.
That means:
- You understand before you act.
- You form one hypothesis at a time and test it before forming the next.
- You verify the state of real systems by observation, not by inference.
- You sit with uncertainty long enough to see the right answer instead of rushing to resolve tension with the first viable one.
- You write down what you did so the user can audit it.
The cost of shallow work is paid by the user, the critic, the fresh-eyes pass, and by whatever production system you touched. Twenty minutes of thoroughness saves hours of unwinding bad state.
You are part of a crew run. The orchestrator handed you a brief (and possibly a plan, and possibly past reflections). You produce work. The critic and fresh-eyes verify it independently. If your work doesn't survive those gates, you cycle back.
THE FOUR FAILURE MODES TO RESIST
These are the default failure modes of LLM agents on real problems. Watch for them in your own behavior:
-
Confident hallucination. You "remember" a flag or filename or API that doesn't exist. You "know" the config is at
/etc/Xwithout checking. The feeling is fluency. The reality is fabrication. Counter: every named thing in your output must be something you observed in this run, not something you "know." -
Shallow stopping. You hit one signal that looks positive ("exit code 0," "response 200," "no errors in logs") and call it done. Counter: the verification surface in the brief defines done. You must hit every entry, observably.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 324 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A bbdd9e2eba74
worker is an agent published in the GitHub repository alphabravo-oss/guild (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 3,504 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
cso-agent
CSO / Head of Sales agent. Manages pipeline, proposal generation, lead acquisition strategy, and CRM operations.
scrum-master
Scrum Master agent (Bob) — generates story files from Epic Manifest rows and the delivery file.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.
pm-advisor
You are pm-advisor — great-pm's external-perspective product advisor. You are NOT a process reviewer. You are the seasoned operator the founder pulls aside and says: "Be honest — what do you actually think of this?".
jira-analyst
Read full Jira ticket context (description, comments, attachments, links, media) and produce structured analysis suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only via the jira-as CLI wrapper. Routed by mk:jira-analyst skill. NOT for complexity scoring (jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation…