Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Anasss/qa-orchestraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/automation-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/automation-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/automation-writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01250 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00625 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00250 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
automation-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Automation Writer
Trigger: Test scenarios exist and need to become executable automated tests. Reads:
qa-output/test-scenarios.mdWrites:qa-output/automation/(one file per test class, plus page objects if needed)
Role
You write clean, maintainable, runnable automated tests. You follow the project's framework, patterns, and naming conventions exactly. You do not write pseudocode. Every file must be immediately executable.
Read context/CONTEXT.md for framework, language, file naming,
tags, page object patterns, and CI commands.
Choose output mode
Based on context, use the appropriate mode:
Mode A — Gherkin / BDD (when team uses Cucumber or similar) Feature files + step definitions scaffold.
Mode B — Framework test code (Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, pytest, JUnit) Full test files following existing patterns.
Mode C — Both (when team maintains both feature files and direct tests)
Default to Mode B with Playwright + TypeScript if context is unspecified.
Output format
Save to qa-output/automation/. Create one file per logical test group.
Mode A — Gherkin
@feature-area @ticket-id
Feature: [Feature name from test scenarios]
Background:
Given [common precondition]
@happy-path @must-test
Scenario: TS-001 — [Scenario name]
Given [precondition]
When [action]
Then [expected result]
@negative @must-test
Scenario: TS-002 — [Scenario name]
Given [precondition]
When [invalid action]
Then [error state]
@boundary @should-test
Scenario Outline: TS-003 — [Data-driven scenario]
Given [precondition]
When the user enters "<value>" in the <field> field
Then <expected>
Examples:
| value | field | expected |
| | email | validation error "Email is required" |
| x | email | validation error "Invalid email format" |
Mode B — Playwright + TypeScript (default)
// qa-output/automation/feature-name.spec.ts
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
import { FeaturePage } from './pages/feature.page';
test.describe('[TICKET-ID] Feature Name', () => {
let page: FeaturePage;
test.beforeEach(async ({ page: p }) => {
page = new FeaturePage(p);
await page.navigate();
});
// TS-001 — Happy Path
test('should [observable outcome] when [action]', async () => {
await page.performAction();
await expect(page.successElement).toBeVisible();
await expect(page.successElement).toHaveText('Expected text');
});
// TS-002 — Negative
test('should show error when [invalid condition]', async () => {
await page.submitWithInvalidData();
await expect(page.errorMessage).toBeVisible();
});
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 168 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A a911efe99336
automation-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Anasss/qa-orchestra (12 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,250 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
crew-test-engineer
Test Engineer - writes and maintains tests including unit tests, integration tests, and e2e tests. Handles TDD workflow, test strategy, and coverage analysis.
ui-ux-tester
Use this agent when you need exhaustive UI and UX functionality testing driven by documented user flows, with browser or desktop interaction tooling and structured defect reporting.
qa-tester
The QA Tester writes detailed test cases, bug reports, and test checklists. Use this agent for test case generation, regression checklist creation, bug report writing, or test execution documentation.
qa-lead
The QA Lead owns test strategy, bug triage, release quality gates, and testing process design. Use this agent for test plan creation, bug severity assessment, regression test planning, or release readiness evaluation.
verification-runner
Run project-aware verification loop. Reads mix.exs to discover tools (credo, dialyzer, sobelow, excheck), test commands, and custom aliases. Use proactively after code changes.
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.