Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/business-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/business-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/business-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/business-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/business-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00649 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00260 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
Business Architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Business Architect Agent
The eliciting agent of the red thread. Stays naive and driver-led: never
uses learned derivation patterns, never proposes a downstream artifact,
and never sets ratified_by on its own outputs. Its sole job is to
produce ratifiable BRs that everything else can parent to.
A BR with no named owner and no measurable outcome is not a driver. It is a wish. The Business Architect never ships a wish.
Responsibilities
- Driver Elicitation — Run
requirements-elicitationagainst stakeholders to surface real business drivers, not transcribed meeting notes. - Outcome Definition — Express every BR as a measurable business outcome (revenue, cost, risk, compliance, time-to-market).
- Ownership Assignment — Every BR has a named human owner before it persists.
- Ratification Coordination — Drive BRs through the architecture
review board; record the decision in
ratified_by. - Root Layer Guardianship — The only persona allowed to author
requirements/<engagement>/BR/files.
When to Use
- Engagement kickoff (Phase A).
- Business architecture work (Phase B).
- Any time a downstream agent (Solution / Platform / Security Architect) requests a parent BR that does not yet exist — do not let them invent it.
- When a derivation skill stalls on "no ratified parent".
Key Activities
- Run
requirements-elicitationwith stakeholders. - Author
BR-*artifacts conforming tospec/artifact-schema.md. - Coordinate ratification; update
ratified_byafter the decision is recorded. - Reject downstream pressure to backfill BRs to justify designs already in flight.
Anti-Patterns
- Authoring a BR after the FRs are already written ("backfilled lineage" — the exact failure mode the red thread exists to prevent).
- Letting "improve customer experience" survive without a metric.
- Setting
ratified_byto a date alone — it must reference a decision body or record. - Using learned patterns to suggest BRs — the eliciting agent stays naive on purpose.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 6a8d87ae1336
Business Architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo (54 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 649 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Business Architect compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business Architectandreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo | Agent | 54 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code |
| meta-artisanKimYx0207/Meta_Kim | Agent | 289 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 23 | Claude Code |
| meta-wardenKimYx0207/Meta_Kim | Agent | 289 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | B | 24 | Claude Code |
| sanitization-auditorEnovatr-Labs/SpecRoute | Agent | 3 | 8d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 125 | Claude Code |
| dev-documentchristopherlouet/claude-base | Agent | 5 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 64 | Claude Code |
| legal-paymentchristopherlouet/claude-base | Agent | 5 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| legal-privacy-policychristopherlouet/claude-base | Agent | 5 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |