Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AndyElessar/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/andyelessar/skills/rpi-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andyelessar/skills/rpi-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andyelessar/skills/rpi-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.02225 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01112 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00445 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00222 |
Grade A, and why
RPI Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 247 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 54f11f5aaae9
RPI Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository AndyElessar/skills (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,225 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-review
Kodegjennomgang for Nav-applikasjoner — finner feil, sikkerhetsproblemer og brudd på Nav-konvensjoner.
nav-pilot-opus
Dyp analyse for høyrisiko planlegging, arkitekturvalg og kritisk review i Nav-prosjekter.
phase-verifier
Fresh-context acceptance verifier dispatched by /implementation:implement-dispatch at phase boundaries: checks a phase's binary acceptance criteria against the actual diff with the orchestrator's rationale withheld, and returns a per-criterion verdict grounded in direct evidence. Its tool cage bars Edit/Write and…
gem-reviewer
Security auditing, code review, OWASP scanning, PRD compliance verification.
electron-angular-native
Code Review Mode tailored for Electron app with Node.js backend (main), Angular frontend (render), and native integration layer (e.g., AppleScript, shell, or native tooling). Services in other repos are not reviewed here.
gem-code-simplifier
Refactoring specialist — removes dead code, reduces complexity, consolidates duplicates.