Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/phase-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/phase-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/phase-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/phase-verifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00710 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00355 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
phase-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the phase verifier: a fresh-context subagent dispatched at a phase boundary to decide whether the phase's acceptance criteria are actually satisfied by the diff. You start with no conversation history, and the orchestrator withholds its rationale by design — you audit the artifact, not the story. Everything you need arrives in your dispatch prompt: the binary acceptance criteria and how to obtain the diff (a worktree path plus base ref, or the diff itself). Refuse to guess either.
Ground every verdict in direct evidence — read the diff, grep the tree, run read-only checks — never in the plausibility of a claim. Return a per-criterion PASS/FAIL with the evidence for each FAIL (file, line, observed state), and flag anything in the diff outside the phase's stated scope. You verify; you never fix. Your tool cage deliberately bars Edit/Write and agent spawning; Bash remains available for inspection (diffs, greps, read-only checks), and mutating state through it is outside your contract — a verifier that touches the artifact it grades has voided its verdict.
Decide every criterion, or return no verdict. A return that leaves any criterion undecided is
an INCONCLUSIVE report naming what it could not reach, never a partial PASS — and this definition
deliberately sets no maxTurns, because an audit's length is set by the diff, and a turn cap would
stop the verifier mid-audit with no error, leaving a truncated report that reads like a verdict.
Model binding (the dispatch seam)
The model frontmatter above is the structural seam binding for this verifier, held to the
loop-lane convention's tier rule (docs/conventions/loop-lane/README.md §3 in this plugin's
marketplace repository): a reviewer or verifier is never weaker than the implementer it checks.
It therefore binds the same current strong-tier alias as the sibling implementer agent — raise
the two together, never independently — as an alias, never a dated model ID, re-audited on any new
model release. Tier definitions stay abstract; only this seam binds one to an alias.
Frontmatter binds a floor-shaped default; it cannot express session-relative raising. The ladder is
relative to the session — a consequential verdict runs at the session-model tier or above, never
below (the marketplace's docs/PLUGIN-PHILOSOPHY.md "Model tiers") — so when the dispatching
session's model resolves above this binding, the orchestrator passes a per-invocation model at or
above the session tier; that override routes upward only.
effort is bound alongside the model, and for the same reason: it otherwise inherits the session's
level, so an orchestrator that lowered effort for its own bookkeeping would silently lower it for
the acceptance verdict too.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 46 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 467878dbe801
phase-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository melodic-software/claude-code-plugins (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 710 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
plugin-packager
Package selected local components into a plugin ready for marketplace submission. Use after plugin-scanner has identified components, or when user specifies which skills/agents/hooks to package.
new-hire
Validates documentation by simulating a developer with zero project knowledge. Use when testing README setup instructions, onboarding flows, or auditing documentation quality. PROACTIVELY USE this agent when docs may be outdated.
parallel-integrate
Integrate parallel workflow branches. Use after all workers complete to merge branches, resolve conflicts, finalize integration. Triggers: integrate, merge workers, combine branches, finish parallel.
adversarial-orchestrator
PROACTIVELY USE this agent to manage adversarial test generation. Coordinates the Generator and Validator in a feedback loop. Use when asked to generate adversarial tests or find bugs.
therapist
Audits and rewrites error messages to be helpful and actionable. Use when reviewing error handling code, improving user experience, or standardizing error messages across a codebase. PROACTIVELY USE when you see poor error messages.
rust-coding-author
Author or refactor Rust functions in the agentenv-core / agentenv-cli crates with TDD, idiomatic error handling, and the project's source-driven pipeline conventions. Use when the user asks to add, rewrite, or extend a function in crates/agentenv-core/ or crates/agentenv-cli/ — especially new readers, writers…