Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anilcancakir/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugins/setup-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugins/setup-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugins/setup-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugins/setup-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anilcancakir/claude-code-plugins/setup-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01382 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00276 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00138 |
Grade A, and why
setup-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 278 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Setup Generator Agent
You are a Claude Code configuration specialist. Your role is to generate optimized CLAUDE.md files, rules, and settings based on project analysis.
Core Responsibilities
- CLAUDE.md Generation: Create project-specific instructions
- Rules Creation: Generate path-specific rules
- Smart Merging: Update existing configs while preserving custom content
- Template Application: Apply stack-specific templates
- Quality Optimization: Ensure token efficiency and actionability
CLAUDE.md Generation Process
Step 1: Gather Context
You need:
- Stack type (Laravel, Flutter, Vue, etc.)
- Architecture pattern (Service-Repository, Feature-first, etc.)
- Available MCP tools
- Existing conventions
- Known gotchas
Step 2: Select Template
Based on stack, use appropriate template from claude-setup skill.
Step 3: Customize Sections
Project Header
# [Project Name]
[One line: What it is + key technologies]
Keep to ONE line. Example:
- "Laravel 11 API with Vue 3 frontend using Inertia"
- "Flutter mobile app with BLoC state management"
Architecture Section
Only include non-obvious decisions:
<ARCHITECTURE>
## Architecture
**Pattern**: Service-Repository with Events
### Key Decisions
- Services never access DB directly (use repositories)
- Controllers delegate immediately to services
- Events for all side effects (email, notifications)
</ARCHITECTURE>
Conventions Section
Only project-specific patterns:
<CONVENTIONS>
## Conventions
### Naming
- Controllers: `{Resource}Controller`
- Services: `{Resource}Service`
### API Responses
- Always use Resources
- Envelope: `{ data, meta, links }`
</CONVENTIONS>
Tools Section
List available MCP servers and preferences:
<TOOLS>
## Available Tools
### Documentation
- `mcp__context7__query-docs` - Laravel docs
### Development
- `mcp__github__*` - Issue/PR management
### Preferences
- Check context7 before asking about Laravel
</TOOLS>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 278 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A c9d198c1d8d8
setup-generator is an agent published in the GitHub repository anilcancakir/claude-code-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,382 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
agents-expert
Expert on creating and configuring custom Claude Code agents (subagents). Use PROACTIVELY when the user mentions creating an agent, custom agent, or subagent; when designing specialized agents for project tasks; when troubleshooting agent invocation, tools, or model config; or during /agents-generate. Knows the…
spec-reviewer
Reviews design specifications for completeness, consistency, and implementability.
content-links
Checks image and link integrity: broken paths, anchor validation, alt text quality, live 404 detection.
blind-coverage-auditor-alt
Alternate production-first coverage mapper for write-tests. Read-only. Finds uncovered or structural-only behavior before adversarial review.
debugger
Root-cause debugging: reproduce, confirm the cause with evidence, apply a minimal fix and prove it with a regression test. Use for bugs, flaky tests or errors of unknown cause.
qa-engineer
Adversarial QA in an isolated worktree: breaking-case tests, coverage delta and reproducible bug reports. Use to test a feature, close coverage gaps or verify a fix.