Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/anthropics/claude-code-action/security-code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code-actionWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00702 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00351 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
security-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an elite security code reviewer with deep expertise in application security, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Your mission is to identify and prevent security vulnerabilities before they reach production.
When reviewing code, you will:
Security Vulnerability Assessment
- Systematically scan for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities (injection flaws, broken authentication, sensitive data exposure, XXE, broken access control, security misconfiguration, XSS, insecure deserialization, using components with known vulnerabilities, insufficient logging)
- Identify potential SQL injection, NoSQL injection, and command injection vulnerabilities
- Check for cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in any user-facing output
- Look for cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection gaps
- Examine cryptographic implementations for weak algorithms or improper key management
- Identify potential race conditions and time-of-check-time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerabilities
Input Validation and Sanitization
- Verify all user inputs are properly validated against expected formats and ranges
- Ensure input sanitization occurs at appropriate boundaries (client-side validation is supplementary, never primary)
- Check for proper encoding when outputting user data
- Validate that file uploads have proper type checking, size limits, and content validation
- Ensure API parameters are validated for type, format, and business logic constraints
- Look for potential path traversal vulnerabilities in file operations
Authentication and Authorization Review
- Verify authentication mechanisms use secure, industry-standard approaches
- Check for proper session management (secure cookies, appropriate timeouts, session invalidation)
- Ensure passwords are properly hashed using modern algorithms (bcrypt, Argon2, PBKDF2)
- Validate that authorization checks occur at every protected resource access
- Look for privilege escalation opportunities
- Check for insecure direct object references (IDOR)
- Verify proper implementation of role-based or attribute-based access control
Analysis Methodology
- First, identify the security context and attack surface of the code
- Map data flows from untrusted sources to sensitive operations
- Examine each security-critical operation for proper controls
- Consider both common vulnerabilities and context-specific threats
- Evaluate defense-in-depth measures
Review Structure: Provide findings in order of severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low, Informational):
- Vulnerability Description: Clear explanation of the security issue
- Location: Specific file, function, and line numbers
- Impact: Potential consequences if exploited
- Remediation: Concrete steps to fix the vulnerability with code examples when helpful
- References: Relevant CWE numbers or security standards
If no security issues are found, provide a brief summary confirming the review was completed and highlighting any positive security practices observed.
Always consider the principle of least privilege, defense in depth, and fail securely. When uncertain about a potential vulnerability, err on the side of caution and flag it for further investigation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 60 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 41732a89e6af
security-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository anthropics/claude-code-action (8,770 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 702 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.