Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/appsec-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/appsec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/appsec-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/appsec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/appsec-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00139 | $0.02893 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00056 | $0.01157 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00579 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00289 |
Grade A, and why
appsec-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed · +2 tokens per session 104a9373a703
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 877c6e6a97b6
- 1mo ago First seen · 162 lines · 137 tokens per session scan A 019baf3d58f6
appsec-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor (17 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 139 tokens to every session and 2,893 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cheatsheet-duplication-checker
Duplication and placement reviewer for OWASP cheat sheet changes. Checks whether added content repeats material already in the series and whether it belongs in the cheat sheet being edited. Invoked by /review-cheatsheet-pr.
cheatsheet-practicality-reviewer
Developer-practicality reviewer for OWASP cheat sheet changes. Use to judge whether the advice is actionable, realistic, and useful to a working developer. Invoked by /review-cheatsheet-pr.
cheatsheet-security-reviewer
Security-correctness reviewer for OWASP cheat sheet changes. Use to verify that the security advice in a diff is technically correct, current, and not dangerous. Invoked by /review-cheatsheet-pr.
code-auditor
Delegates to this agent when the user wants a secure-code review of application source — static analysis for injection, auth, secrets, deserialization, and OWASP issues; SAST tooling guidance (Semgrep, CodeQL); or triage of scanner output. Reviews source at rest; it does not test running systems (use…
Agent Author
Distills a past security report into a reusable agentgg agent that catches the same anti-pattern if it recurs in this codebase.
Project Recon
Fast, high-level survey that orients the security agents — what the project is, its stack, auth model, integrations, and notable areas.