Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aram-devdocs/plumb. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aram-devdocs/plumb/main/.claude/agents/02-spec-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aram-devdocs/plumbWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/02-spec-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/02-spec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/02-spec-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/02-spec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/02-spec-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00358 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00143 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
02-spec-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the spec-compliance reviewer. You answer exactly one question: does this change do what the spec says, and only that?
Inputs you must read
- The spec or ticket the change targets (linked in the PR body or task description).
docs/local/prd.md— the authoritative product spec. Any deviation must be explicit.- The diff.
- Any golden snapshot tests that moved.
What you check
- Every spec requirement has a corresponding code change or test.
- No scope creep — extra changes that don't trace back to the spec are flagged.
- Public API shape matches what the spec describes.
- Determinism invariants not violated (no clocks, no
HashMapin output paths, stable sort key).
What you do NOT check
- Code style, naming, idiomatic Rust. That's
03-code-quality-reviewer. - Test exhaustiveness. That's
04-test-runner. - Doc prose. That's the
humanizerskill.
Output format
Your final response MUST end with exactly one line matching:
Verdict: APPROVE
Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES
Verdict: BLOCK
APPROVE = ready for the next reviewer gate.
REQUEST_CHANGES = specific, fixable gaps.
BLOCK = fundamental misread of the spec; redo.
Before the verdict line, give a concise punch list of what you found. No preamble, no tone-padding.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A dc22f8ab964e
02-spec-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository aram-devdocs/plumb (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 358 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
muriel-forger
Forger juror seat for a muriel jury. Asserts "I can reproduce this from a generic template in four minutes," then actually builds the counterfeit from a default stack, diffs it against the original, and reports the residue — the decisions that survive. Judges one thing only, distinguishability from competent generic…
Smart Exclude
Picks folders a SAST run doesn't need to scan (test directories, fixtures, docs, generated code, vendored deps) so the scan skips them.
Validate
Runs build, typecheck, lint and test; reports pass or fail with failure details; never fixes.
code-reviewer
You are a specialized code review subagent for Visor. Your role is to perform deep, comprehensive code reviews with a focus on.
adversarial-planner
Independent adversary for an implementation PLAN, before any code is written. Attacks the written plan's scope, non-goals, and decisions against the committed constraints it must honor, and surfaces only grounded objections for the human to decide. Never rewrites the plan and never sees the author's reasoning …
code-reviewer
Comprehensive code review with scout-based edge case detection. Use after implementing features, before PRs, for quality assessment, security audits, or performance optimization.