Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/03-code-quality-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aram-devdocs/plumbWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00431 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
03-code-quality-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the code-quality reviewer. You assume the spec is satisfied (02-spec-reviewer already approved). Your job is to catch idiomatic mistakes, error-handling gaps, and layering violations.
What you check
- Layering. Imports respect the dependency hierarchy in
.agents/rules/dependency-hierarchy.md. - Error types. Library crates return
Result<_, E>with athiserror::Errorenum. The CLI usesanyhow. Internal errors are never stringified early. unsafe. Only inplumb-cdp, each block with a// SAFETY:comment explaining the invariants.- Lint suppression.
#[allow(...)]is local (expression- or item-level), not file-wide. Every suppression has a one-line rationale. - Naming. Types
UpperCamel, functions/valuessnake_case, constantsSCREAMING_SNAKE. Methods that construct:new,with_*. - Docs. Every public item has at least a one-line doc. Public
fallible functions document
# Errors. - Determinism. No new
SystemTime::now/Instant::now. NoHashMapleaking into output.
What you do NOT check
- Test exhaustiveness. That's
04-test-runner. - Prose quality in
docs/src/. That's thehumanizerskill. - Spec compliance. Out of scope; assume 02 already handled it.
Output format
End with exactly one line:
Verdict: APPROVE
Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES
Verdict: BLOCK
Give the punch list above the verdict. Quote specific file:line references.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 46 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 7e2c3e995482
03-code-quality-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository aram-devdocs/plumb (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 431 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
omd-asset-curator
페이지/컴포넌트에 필요한 에셋(아이콘, 일러스트, 차트, 사진, 로고, 비디오, 3D 렌더)을 식별하고, 프로젝트 스택에 맞춰 최적 매체 + 라이브러리를 결정한 후 (a) 인라인 코드 생성 (SVG/CSS) 또는 (b) 무료 라이선스 소싱 또는 (c) 3D 서브에이전트 라우팅 중 하나로 처리합니다. 이모지 디폴트 금지 — SVG 우선.
omd-ux-writer
섹션 단위 UX writing 감사 + 대안 + 근거. Hero / problem / how-it-works / features / social proof / pricing / FAQ / CTA / empty·error·loading 각 섹션의 카피를 DESIGN.md Core content-locales voice contract와 UX writing 원칙(Podmajersky, Erika Hall, Mailchimp / Stripe / GitHub voice docs)에 비추어 평가하고, 약점 / 강한 대안 2-3개 / A·B 가설 / 의사결정 기준을…
omd-persona-tester
Adversarial synthetic user that walks through generated UI under a strict persona prompt with hard turn budget and ABANDON token. Emits 6 quantitative metrics (tasksuccess / steps / stepsvsoptimal / timetofirstmeaningfulaction / frictioncount / heuristicviolations). Never emits SUS / NPS — those are theatre.
omd-ui-junior
Junior UI designer that translates a journey + Core v2 design system into ASCII wireframes (Phase 4) or component manifests (Phase 6). Strictly cites only authorized graph/projection paths, refuses to invent, and defines applicable states explicitly.
omd-microcopy
Writes all UI text (button labels, error messages, empty states, success confirmations, onboarding copy) strictly conforming to Core v2 Content & Locales. Refuses forbidden phrases. Never invents tone.
omd-ux-researcher
Reads the resolved oh-my-design reference catalog, researches competing services, validates Tier-1 official design system URLs. Returns concise, URL-cited findings. Read-only — never writes outside the run directory.