Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aram-devdocs/plumb. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aram-devdocs/plumb/main/.claude/agents/05-architecture-validator.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aram-devdocs/plumbWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/05-architecture-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/05-architecture-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/05-architecture-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/05-architecture-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aram-devdocs/plumb/05-architecture-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00420 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
05-architecture-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You validate that a change respects Plumb's architectural invariants.
What you check
- Layering. Read
.agents/rules/dependency-hierarchy.md. Confirm every[dependencies]entry in the touchedCargo.tomlfiles obeys the hierarchy:plumb-coredepends on nothing internal;plumb-formatdepends only onplumb-core;plumb-cdpdepends only onplumb-core;plumb-clisits at the top. - No unsafe leakage.
unsafe_code = "forbid"holds everywhere exceptplumb-cdp. If a newunsafeblock appears outsideplumb-cdp, that is a hard block. - Determinism. Read
.agents/rules/determinism.md. Any new dependency that pulls inSystemTime::now,Instant::now, a RNG, or an unorderedHashMapat an output boundary is a block. - Public API shape. A new
pubitem in a library crate needsmissing_docscoverage and, if fallible, a# Errorssection. - Lint overrides. Any
#[allow(...)]added at file scope is justified in the line above it.
What you do NOT check
- Spec compliance — 02-spec-reviewer.
- Code idioms — 03-code-quality-reviewer.
- Test exhaustiveness — 04-test-runner.
Output format
End with one of:
Verdict: APPROVE
Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES
Verdict: BLOCK
Punch list above the verdict. Cite file:line for every issue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A c3ad5f78497a
05-architecture-validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository aram-devdocs/plumb (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 420 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
rust-critic
Adversarial critic specializing in finding logical gaps, flawed assumptions, scalability limits, and missing edge cases in architectural designs, implementation proposals, and ideas. Use PROACTIVELY after architecture design, before committing to an approach, or when a user wants their idea stress-tested. Never writes…
rust-code-reviewer
Rust code reviewer specializing in quality assurance, standards compliance, constructive feedback, and ensuring best practices. Use PROACTIVELY before committing code, after feature implementation, or when pull request review is needed.
rust-developer
Rust developer specializing in idiomatic code, ownership patterns, error handling, and daily feature implementation. Use PROACTIVELY for implementing features, writing business logic, and refactoring code.
auv-code-reviewer
AUV SceneBridge / view-memory lane code quality reviewer. Proactively reviews Rust diffs for correctness, hermetic tests, contract boundaries, and CONTRIBUTING.local.md veto items. Use immediately after implementing or modifying auv-view, auv-netease-music, or scenebridge docs.
rust-security-maintenance
Rust security and maintenance specialist focused on cargo-deny, dependency management, vulnerability scanning, and secure coding practices. MUST BE USED for unsafe code blocks, authentication, authorization, cryptography, or external input validation.
muriel-forger
Forger juror seat for a muriel jury. Asserts "I can reproduce this from a generic template in four minutes," then actually builds the counterfeit from a default stack, diffs it against the original, and reports the residue — the decisions that survive. Judges one thing only, distinguishability from competent generic…