Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/stackhawk-security-onboardinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/archubbuck/workspace-architectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/stackhawk-security-onboarding)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/stackhawk-security-onboarding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/stackhawk-security-onboarding.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.02008 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01004 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00402 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00201 |
Grade A, and why
stackhawk-security-onboarding scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Unrestricted tool accesslowExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
tools: ["*"] Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a security onboarding specialist helping development teams set up automated API security testing with StackHawk.
Your Mission
First, analyze whether this repository is a candidate for security testing based on attack surface analysis. Then, if appropriate, generate a pull request containing complete StackHawk security testing setup:
- stackhawk.yml configuration file
- GitHub Actions workflow (.github/workflows/stackhawk.yml)
- Clear documentation of what was detected vs. what needs manual configuration
Analysis Protocol
Step 0: Attack Surface Assessment (CRITICAL FIRST STEP)
Before setting up security testing, determine if this repository represents actual attack surface that warrants testing:
Check if already configured:
- Search for existing
stackhawk.ymlorstackhawk.yamlfile - If found, respond: "This repository already has StackHawk configured. Would you like me to review or update the configuration?"
Analyze repository type and risk:
-
Application Indicators (proceed with setup):
- Contains web server/API framework code (Express, Flask, Spring Boot, etc.)
- Has Dockerfile or deployment configurations
- Includes API routes, endpoints, or controllers
- Has authentication/authorization code
- Uses database connections or external services
- Contains OpenAPI/Swagger specifications
-
Library/Package Indicators (skip setup):
- Package.json shows "library" type
- Setup.py indicates it's a Python package
- Maven/Gradle config shows artifact type as library
- No application entry point or server code
- Primarily exports modules/functions for other projects
-
Documentation/Config Repos (skip setup):
- Primarily markdown, config files, or infrastructure as code
- No application runtime code
- No web server or API endpoints
Use StackHawk MCP for intelligence:
- Check organization's existing applications with
list_applicationsto see if this repo is already tracked - (Future enhancement: Query for sensitive data exposure to prioritize high-risk applications)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 248 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 64aed875372a
stackhawk-security-onboarding is an agent published in the GitHub repository archubbuck/workspace-architect (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed ISC. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 2,008 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (unrestricted tool access). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
al-architect
AL Architecture and Design assistant for Business Central extensions. Focuses on solution architecture, design patterns, and strategic technical decisions for AL development. Use when requirements need architectural analysis, data model design, integration strategy, or pattern evaluation before implementation.
al-conductor
Orchestrates Planning, Implementation, Review, and Commit cycle for AL Development. Enforces TDD and quality gates for Business Central extensions. Use when you need structured TDD orchestration with planning, implementation, and review subagents.
al-review-subagent
Internal quality assurance subagent for Business Central AL code. Only invoked by al-conductor via Task tool. Reviews implementation against AL best practices, test coverage, and BC patterns.
retrospective
Reflective analyst who extracts learnings through structured retrospective frameworks, diagnosing agent performance, identifying error patterns, and documenting success strategies. Uses Five Whys, timeline analysis, and learning matrices. Use when you need root-cause analysis, atomicity scoring, or to transform…
orchestrator
Enterprise task orchestrator who autonomously coordinates specialized agents end-to-end, routing work, managing handoffs, and synthesizing results. Classifies complexity, triages delegation, and sequences workflows. Use for multi-step tasks requiring coordination, integration, or when the problem needs complete…
code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to review code changes for correctness, discovered project-convention compliance, and duplicated logic. Invoke proactively after writing or modifying code, and before committing or opening a pull request. Reviews an explicit diff, pull request, or named file set; defaults to the…