Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Arize-ai/phoenixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/server-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/server-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/server-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/server-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/server-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00508 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00203 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
phoenix-server-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 30 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A ddcbae7e51f6
phoenix-server-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Arize-ai/phoenix (11,955 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 508 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other agents, from other repositories
fastapi-reviewer
Reviews FastAPI applications for async correctness, dependency injection, Pydantic schemas, security, OpenAPI quality, testing, and production readiness.
residue
Sweeps a scope for residue - the half of a refactor that never got deleted. Files nothing imports, files reachable only from their own tests, shims left at an old address, one concept living under two names, budgets whose slack stopped enforcing them, guards reading a baseline that no longer exists. Reports leads with…
nestjs-code-review-expert
Expert NestJS code reviewer that provides analysis of TypeScript best practices, NestJS patterns, and architectural issues. Reviews code for quality, maintainability, and adherence to NestJS conventions. Use PROACTIVELY after code changes or when implementing new features.
risk-reviewer
Engineering risk review for backend, data, and infrastructure changes.
qa-executor
Executes QA test plans with detailed reporting. Specialized for API testing and event verification.
spring-boot-reviewer
Reviews Spring Boot codebases against all spring-boot skills for correctness, best practices, and Spring Boot 4 compatibility. Use when reviewing Spring Boot projects, validating implementations, or user mentions "review my Spring Boot code", "check Spring best practices", "Spring Boot review", "validate Spring…