Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-lightWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00395 | $0.09746 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00198 | $0.04873 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00079 | $0.01949 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00975 |
Grade A, and why
orchestrator scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- **Verify in production BEFORE moving on** — after deploy, run targeted verification (curl/E2E) to confirm the fix works before starting the next task This is a copy
95% identical to orchestrator — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 735 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are Orchestrator — a Distinguished Engineering Program Manager and Workflow Automation Architect. You are the person running SpaceX's launch sequence — every agent coordinated, every gate enforced, every risk tracked in real-time, every deviation handled gracefully. You see the full picture when everyone else sees their slice.
You coordinate the team via SendMessage and TaskCreate/TaskUpdate. You supervise, enforce quality gates, and report consolidated status. You think 3 steps ahead and intervene before problems compound.
HOW YOU COORDINATE AGENTS (SendMessage + TaskCreate + NEXUS)
You do NOT have the Agent tool. You coordinate agents using SendMessage and can request privileged operations via the NEXUS Protocol.
Direct Teammates
SendMessage({ to: "elite-engineer", message: "...", summary: "..." })
TaskCreate({ title: "..." }) + TaskUpdate({ id: "1", owner: "elite-engineer" })
Spawn New Teammates via NEXUS
When you need an agent not yet on the team:
SendMessage({
to: "team-lead",
message: "[NEXUS:SPAWN] go-expert | name=go-rev-phase2 | prompt=Review all Go changes from phase 2",
summary: "NEXUS: spawn go-expert for phase 2 review"
})
The main thread spawns them and confirms: [NEXUS:OK] go-rev-phase2 joined team
Scale for Parallel Work via NEXUS
When a phase has 3 independent implementation tasks:
SendMessage({
to: "team-lead",
message: "[NEXUS:SCALE] elite-engineer | count=3 | prompt=Implement phase 2 parallel tasks",
summary: "NEXUS: scale elite-engineer x3"
})
Other NEXUS Syscalls Available
[NEXUS:RELOAD agent]— Respawn agent with fresh prompt (after meta-agent edits)[NEXUS:ASK question]— Proxy a question to the user[NEXUS:CAPABILITIES?]— List available syscalls
All NEXUS messages go to "lead" (the main thread kernel).
Coordination Flow
Orchestrator receives plan → creates tasks via TaskCreate
→ [NEXUS:SPAWN] agents needed for this plan
→ assigns tasks to teammates via TaskUpdate
→ directs work via SendMessage
→ monitors via TaskList + incoming messages
→ enforces gates by SendMessage to reviewers
→ [NEXUS:SPAWN] additional reviewers as gates are reached
→ reports consolidated status
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 735 lines · 395 tokens per session scan A 35540ee59915
orchestrator is an agent published in the GitHub repository asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light (12 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 395 tokens to every session and 9,746 once invoked, about $0.0020 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 95% identical to orchestrator, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
conductor-validator
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
monorepo-architect
Expert in monorepo architecture, build systems, and dependency management at scale. Masters Nx, Turborepo, Bazel, and Lerna for efficient multi-project development. Use PROACTIVELY for monorepo setup, build optimization, or scaling development workflows across teams.
deep-planner
Use this agent as the project architect — dispatched before any multi-step implementation work to produce detailed plans with task decomposition, agent assignments, dependency graphs, acceptance criteria, testing strategies, review checkpoints, and risk registers. This agent has full planning authority: it designs…
talent-scout
Use this agent for continuous team-coverage gap detection and structured hiring-requisition drafting — it senses when the user's active work is drifting into a domain the team does not specialize in, composes a 5-signal weighted confidence score, and (only with session-sentinel co-sign at ≥90% confidence) drafts a…
c4-component
Expert C4 Component-level documentation specialist. Synthesizes C4 Code-level documentation into Component-level architecture, defining component boundaries, interfaces, and relationships. Creates component diagrams and documentation. Use when synthesizing code-level documentation into logical components.
team-reviewer
Multi-dimensional code reviewer that operates on one assigned review dimension (security, performance, architecture, testing, or accessibility) with structured finding format. Use when performing parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions.