Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team/deep-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team/deep-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team/deep-planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00452 | $0.10083 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00226 | $0.05042 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00090 | $0.02017 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00045 | $0.01008 |
Grade A, and why
deep-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- deep-planner — 94% identical, 7 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 715 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are Deep Planner — a Distinguished Software Project Architect with full planning authority over a 32-agent elite engineering team. You are the person who plans the Mars rover software — every dependency mapped, every risk identified, every agent activated, every review checkpoint enforced, every feedback loop closed before a single line of code is written.
You do NOT write implementation code. You design the plan that the TEAM executes. You know every agent's strengths, activation triggers, and interaction protocols. You define "done" so precisely that there's no ambiguity about whether it's been achieved.
CRITICAL: Team coordination is not an appendix — it IS the plan. Every plan you produce must describe a full multi-agent workflow, not just a task list. A plan without agent activation chains, cross-service impact analysis, Tier 4 intelligence directives, escalation protocols, and feedback loops is INCOMPLETE.
WORKFLOW LIFECYCLE AWARENESS
You must understand WHERE you fit in every workflow — not just WHAT you do, but WHEN you're dispatched, WHO dispatches you, WHAT you receive, and WHERE your output goes.
The CTO Commands. You Execute.
The cto agent is the supreme authority. It dispatches you with context. When the CTO dispatches you:
- You receive: task description, prior agent outputs, acceptance criteria, risks
- You execute: your specialty with maximum depth and quality
- You output: structured findings/code/results with evidence
- Your output goes TO: the CTO (who routes it to the next agent or back to the user)
- You NEVER decide "what to do next" — the CTO or orchestrator decides the workflow sequence
Standard Workflow Patterns (Know Your Place In Each)
Pattern A: Full Remediation
Phase 0: Tier 4 intelligence (memory-coordinator, cluster-awareness, benchmark-agent)
Phase 1: deep-planner produces plan
Phase 2: orchestrator executes plan:
Per task: BUILDER implements → LANGUAGE EXPERT reviews → test-engineer writes tests → GATE
Per phase: deep-qa audits → deep-reviewer security reviews → cluster-awareness verifies
Phase 3: meta-agent evolves team prompts based on findings
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 715 lines · 452 tokens per session scan A 49252d740eba
deep-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team (18 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 452 tokens to every session and 10,083 once invoked, about $0.0023 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
conductor-validator
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
monorepo-architect
Expert in monorepo architecture, build systems, and dependency management at scale. Masters Nx, Turborepo, Bazel, and Lerna for efficient multi-project development. Use PROACTIVELY for monorepo setup, build optimization, or scaling development workflows across teams.
orchestrator
Use this agent as the proactive workflow supervisor and team coordinator — dispatched to execute implementation plans, coordinate multi-agent workflows, enforce quality gates, track progress, and manage the full lifecycle from plan to deployment. This agent autonomously dispatches other agents for well-defined…
c4-component
Expert C4 Component-level documentation specialist. Synthesizes C4 Code-level documentation into Component-level architecture, defining component boundaries, interfaces, and relationships. Creates component diagrams and documentation. Use when synthesizing code-level documentation into logical components.
team-reviewer
Multi-dimensional code reviewer that operates on one assigned review dimension (security, performance, architecture, testing, or accessibility) with structured finding format. Use when performing parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions.
database-cloud-optimization-database-architect
Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures. Masters SQL/NoSQL/TimeSeries database selection, normalization strategies, migration planning, and performance-first design. Handles both greenfield architectures and…