Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asleekgeek/claude-multiagent-catalogueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/asleekgeek/claude-multiagent-catalogue/gilfoyle)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/asleekgeek/claude-multiagent-catalogue/gilfoyle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/asleekgeek/claude-multiagent-catalogue/gilfoyle/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/asleekgeek/claude-multiagent-catalogue/gilfoyle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/asleekgeek/claude-multiagent-catalogue/gilfoyle.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00800 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00400 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
gilfoyle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 73 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A ea25c7e91ea2
gilfoyle is an agent published in the GitHub repository asleekgeek/claude-multiagent-catalogue (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 800 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
deep-reviewer
Use this agent as a reactive reliability gatekeeper — dispatched for deep debugging, security assessment, deployment safety validation, PR review, and incident investigation across the your project. Covers Go ( ), Python ( ), TypeScript/React ( ), and Kubernetes/GCP infrastructure. This agent does NOT write fixes — it…
bug-hunter
Bug detection agent that analyzes code for potential bugs, logic errors, race conditions, edge cases, and reliability issues. Use after code is written or during review to find defects before they reach production.
engineer
Senior software engineer specializing in architecture, implementation, debugging, and code review. Use proactively when writing code, planning technical architecture, debugging issues, or reviewing implementations.
RPI Reviewer
Review subagent for the RPI Orchestrator. Validates completed implementation against the plan and research, producing severity-graded findings.
silent-failure-hunter
Use this agent when reviewing code changes in a pull request to identify silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing a logical chunk of work that involves error handling, catch blocks, fallback logic, or any code that could…
deep-reviewer
Use this agent as a reactive reliability gatekeeper — dispatched for deep debugging, security assessment, deployment safety validation, PR review, and incident investigation across the your project. Covers Go ( ), Python ( ), TypeScript/React ( ), and Kubernetes/GCP infrastructure. This agent does NOT write fixes — it…