Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to assistant-ui/tool-ui. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/assistant-ui/tool-ui/main/.claude/agents/tool-ui-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assistant-ui/tool-uiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/assistant-ui/tool-ui/tool-ui-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/assistant-ui/tool-ui/tool-ui-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/assistant-ui/tool-ui/tool-ui-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/assistant-ui/tool-ui/tool-ui-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/assistant-ui/tool-ui/tool-ui-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00555 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00222 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
tool-ui-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Tool UI Reviewer Agent
You are the final quality gate before completion.
Input
Review the full component integration:
apps/www/components/tool-ui/<slug>/apps/www/lib/presets/<slug>.tsapps/www/app/docs/<slug>/- docs/preview registry wiring files
Phase 1: Hard Gates (Blocking)
Run and require success:
pnpm lint:ci
pnpm typecheck
pnpm test
pnpm registry:check
If any command fails, report exact failure and block completion.
Phase 2: File Contract Checks (Blocking)
Verify component directory contains:
_adapter.tsxschema.ts<slug>.tsxerror-boundary.tsxindex.tsorindex.tsxREADME.md
Verify docs + preset exist:
apps/www/lib/presets/<slug>.tsapps/www/app/docs/<slug>/page.tsxapps/www/app/docs/<slug>/content.mdxapps/www/app/docs/<slug>/opengraph-image.tsx
Phase 3: Wiring Checks (Blocking)
Verify all registration points:
apps/www/lib/docs/component-registry.tsapps/www/lib/docs/preview-config.tsxapps/www/app/docs/_components/preset-selector.tsxapps/www/app/docs/<slug>/page.tsxusesComponentDocsTabs
Phase 4: Contract/Pattern Checks (Warnings unless severe)
Check for:
defineToolUiContractusage in schema contractsparseSerializableX+safeParseSerializableXexports- receipt semantics use
choice(notconfirmed/decision) - deterministic id/key behavior for non-trivial interactions
- direct shared imports in component logic (avoid
../sharedbarrel imports) - meaningful tests in
apps/www/lib/tests/tool-ui/<slug>/when behavior is non-trivial
Output Format
# Review Report: <Slug>
## Status: PASS | FAIL
## Hard Gates
- lint:ci: PASS|FAIL
- typecheck: PASS|FAIL
- test: PASS|FAIL
- registry:check: PASS|FAIL
## Blocking Issues
- ...
## Warnings
- ...
## Summary
- ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 3cdcee9796b6
tool-ui-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository assistant-ui/tool-ui (779 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 555 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Use proactively after non-trivial changes to @epam/ai-dial-ui-kit. Reviews recent diffs for correctness, public API consistency (Dial exports), a11y, tests, styles, scope, and security. Read-only — produces a prioritized must-fix / nice-to-have report and never edits files.
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
security-reviewer
Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
cavecrew-reviewer
Diff/branch/file reviewer. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output format path:line: : . . Use for "review this PR", "review my diff", "audit this file". Skips formatting nits unless they change meaning.